Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Factors influencing the implementation of workplace-based health interventions for non-communicable disease prevention

A scoping review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22073283
AutoresAliza K C Bhandari (0000-0003-4830-6255, St. Luke's International University), Kaung Suu Lwin (0000-0002-0368-7018, University of Huddersfield), Phuong The Nguyen (0000-0002-5093-9767, Hitotsubashi University), Zin Wai Htay (The University of Tokyo), Drishti Shrestha (St. Luke's International University), Junko Saito (0000-0002-8908-1120, National Cancer Center, autor correspondente), Akiko Yaguchi-Saito (Tokiwa University), Erika Ota (0000-0002-3945-7441, St. Luke's International University), Taichi Shimazu (0000-0001-6000-9830, National Cancer Center)
Ano2026
Volume14
Páginas1750114-1750114
Data de publicação2026-02-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1750114
PMID41835411
OpenAlexW7131649389
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas87

Background: Workplace health promotion interventions are effective in improving employee health. However, most interventions are temporary and cannot be sustained, and a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence implementation is limited. Therefore, using the implementation framework, this scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of workplace health promotion interventions for the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Methods: We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1986 to August 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Consistent with the Arksey and O'Malley framework, two independent reviewers reviewed the titles and abstracts for eligibility, followed by full-text screening using a data extraction form. Subsequently, a narrative summary of the barriers and facilitators identified from the included articles was synthesized and categorized into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The identified barriers and facilitators were stratified according to the implementation outcomes. Results: Of the 38,384 articles identified, 610 articles were eligible for full-text screening, and 53 articles were included in the final analysis. Over 80% of the studies had applied a qualitative or mixed-methods approach, and the most common topics of intervention were reducing physical inactivity and promoting exercise (36%); moreover, 60% of the studies targeted interventions in medium- to large-sized organizations. Most factors were identified in the inner setting domain of the CFIR. The predominant facilitators were evidence strength and quality and leadership engagement, whereas structural characteristics, relative priority, and available resources were the most identified predominant barriers to the implementation of workplace health promotion interventions. Conclusion: The barriers and facilitators identified in this study can be used to implement a process to develop a strategy that targets the identified determinants to improve workplace health promotion interventions and their implementation

Data extraction · Health promotion · Implementation research · MEDLINE · Psychological intervention · Scopus · Systematic review · Health Policy Implementation Science · Physical Activity and Health · Workplace Health and Well-being

  • The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies

    Open Access•Maji Hailemariam, Tatiana Bustos et al.•Implementation Science•2019

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Time and participation in workplace health promotion

    Open Access•Ginny M Sargent, Ginny Sargent et al.•Health Promotion International•2016

  • The relationship between leadership support, workplace health promotion and employee wellbeing in South Africa

    Open Access•Karen Milner, Michael Greyling et al.•Health Promotion International•2015

  • A nutrition labeling intervention in worksite cafeterias

    Open Access•Ellis L Vyth, Esther W C Van Der Meer et al.•Health Promotion International•2012

  • Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of workplace health promotion programs

    Open Access•Jennifer M D Campmans, Denise J M Smit et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Managers' Perceptions of Factors Affecting Employees' Uptake of Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) Offers

    Open Access•Fanny Sigblad, Maria Savela et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Workplace wellness programming in low-and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Heather Wipfli, Kristin Dessie Zacharias et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Transforming the workplace environment to prevent non-communicable chronic diseases

    Open Access•Darcelle Schouw, Robert Mash et al.•Global Health Action•2018

  • “Oh-oh, the others are standing up… I better do the same”. Mixed-method evaluation of the implementation process of ‘Take a Stand!’ - a cluster randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce sitting time among office workers

    Open Access•Ida Høgstedt Danquah, Stine Kloster et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Engaging Leadership and Its Implication for Work Engagement and Job Outcomes at the Individual and Team Level

    Open Access•Vivi Gusrini Rahmadani, Wilmar B Schaufeli et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Implementation of the Healthy Workplace Participatory Program in a Retail Setting

    Open Access•Jaime R Strickland, Anna M Kinghorn et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Factors influencing the implementation of a pilot smoking cessation intervention among migrant workers in Chinese factories

    Open Access•Guanyang Zou, Xiaolin Wei et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Implementation of a workplace smoking ban in bars

    Open Access•Theresa Montini, Lisa A Bero et al.•BMC Public Health•2008

  • A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting

    Open Access•Abigail Morris, Rebecca Murphy et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • The role of business size in assessing the uptake of health promoting workplace initiatives in Australia

    Open Access•Anne W Taylor, Rhiannon Pilkington et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • Evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote commuter cycling

    Open Access•Veerle Dubuy, Katrien De Cocker et al.•BMC Public Health•2013

  • Worksite tobacco control – a qualitative study on perspectives from employers and employees at small worksites

    Open Access•Christine M Kava, Raymond A Ruiz et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia

    Open Access•Melanie Crane, Erika Bohn‐Goldbaum et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Feasibility and acceptability of reducing workplace sitting time

    Open Access•Nyssa Hadgraft, Nyssa T Hadgraft et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • Evaluation of the implementation of a whole-workplace walking programme using the RE-AIM framework

    Open Access•Emma J Adams, Anna Chalkley et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers

    Open Access•Alyssa Welch, Genevieve Healy et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Exploring expected and perceived facilitators and barriers of an indicated prevention strategy to prevent future long-term sickness absence; a qualitative study among employers and employees

    Open Access•Sophie H Klasen, Ludovic G P M van Amelsvoort et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to implementing worksite policies that support physical activity

    Open Access•Maryanne Bailey, Maryanne M Bailey et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • Qualitative comparative analysis of the implementation fidelity of a workplace sedentary reduction intervention

    Open Access•Krista S Leonard, Sarah L Mullane et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • What incentives influence employers to engage in workplace health interventions

    Open Access•Camilla Martinsson, Malin Lohela-Karlsson et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of the occupational health intervention ‘Dynamic Work’

    Open Access•Victoria J E Z Mastenbroek, Judith G M Jelsma et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Health ambassadors in the workplace

    Open Access•Keren L Greenberg, Milka Donchin et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace health and wellbeing services in the NHS from the perspective of senior leaders and wellbeing practitioners

    Open Access•Helen Quirk, Helen Crank et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • A qualitative assessment of the smoking policies and cessation activities at smaller workplaces

    Open Access•Christine M Kava, Edith A Parker et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • A cultural economy approach to workplace health promotion in Australian small and medium sized workplaces

    Open Access•Cathy Banwell, Ginny Sargent et al.•Critical Public Health•2017

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae