Strategies for men’s engagement and its effectiveness in improving child health and immunization—a rapid review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22076367
AutoresSarah Nabia (0009-0005-4942-2508, Johns Hopkins University), Myra Betron (0000-0002-1307-2949, Johns Hopkins University), Elizabeth Arlotti-Parish, Amanda Varnauskas (Johns Hopkins University), Chinelo Cynthia Nduka (Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital), Angioha Pius (ABS Consulting (United States)), J A Munro (0000-0002-3725-7673, Gavi), Jean Munro, Katharine Bagshaw (United States Agency for International Development), Chizoba Wonodi (0000-0002-2793-9216, Johns Hopkins University, autor correspondente), Chizoba Barbara Wonodi
Ano2025
Volume13
Páginas1539190-1539190
Data de publicação2025-05-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539190
PMID40492002
OpenAlexW4410729258
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas37

Introduction: Despite widespread evidence and recognition that women bear the disproportionate burden of caregiving, there are major gaps in action geared towards equalizing this burden of care between men and women especially in the context of child health and immunization. The goal of this rapid review is to identify and summarize effective and promising strategies for men's engagement in child health and immunization in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) and further categorize the strategies into its potential for gender transformative outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases for peer-reviewed literature and identified grey literature sources through key informant interviews. Twenty-seven papers and/or documents were included in the analysis. Data analysis was done through narrative synthesis, and results have been presented using the various levels of the socio-ecological model (SEM). Results: Majority strategies were at the "intrapersonal" level of SEM and focused on individual education and awareness building through one-on-one or group communication approaches and practical training. Efficacy of these strategies was measured using various indicators such as knowledge and perception levels, paternal-infant attachment, biological marker levels, and paternal behavior. Joint / shared couples' decision-making was the only gender transformative outcome reported in this review. Discussion: We found gaps in community and policy level interventions, and provider-side interventions to positively influence men's engagement in child health and immunization. Moreover, only two studies measured the strategies' influence on improving immunization outcomes. Conclusion: It can be concluded there is a significant need for more evidence on gender-transformative approaches in child health and immunization programming in LMICs

Antibody · Child health · Family medicine · Immunization · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Immunology