Equitable access to cochlear implants

Hearing loss is one of the most prevalent sensory conditions worldwide, affecting over 1.5 billion people and is one of the main causes of disability. For individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, cochlear implants (CIs) are one of the most effective rehabilitation options as they can significantly improve speech comprehension, language development, quality of life and social inclusion. Despite their clinical value, however, access to CIs remains highly unequal between and within countries, with implantation rates disproportionately favoring wealthier nations and people with a higher socioeconomic status. Grounded in a human rights approach, this article develops a conceptual and policy-based reflection supported by a targeted review of scientific literature and international legal standards. From this standpoint, access to CIs must be recognized as an enforceable fundamental right. This recognition implies clear international obligations for states to translate their human rights commitments into tangible, inclusive national policies. Furthermore, this perspective emphasizes the ethical responsibility to ensure the real accessibility, affordability and adaptability of cochlear implants, overcoming barriers related to socioeconomic disparities, geography, race and systemic inequalities. This perspective article highlights the urgent need for comprehensive public policies based on international human rights law to ensure equitable access to cochlear implants, advocating a rights-based approach as a necessary strategy to achieve social justice, dignity and full social participation for people with hearing disabilities

Dignity · Economic Justice · Human rights · International law · Social inequality · Social responsibility · Socioeconomic status · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

• Hearing Loss, Loneliness, and Social Isolation

  Open Access•Aishwarya Shukla, Michael Harper et al.•Otolaryngology–Head and Neck…•2020

  Incluir item

• The legal determinants of health

  Open Access•Lawrence O Gostin, John T Monahan et al.•The Lancet•2019

  Incluir item

• Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

  Open Access•Gill Livingston, Jonathan Huntley et al.•The Lancet•2020

  Incluir item

• Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990–2019

  Open Access•Lydia M Haile, Kaloyan Kamenov et al.•The Lancet•2021

  Incluir item

• Disability in a Human Rights Context

  Open Access•Theresia Degener•Laws•2016

  Incluir item

• From Screening to Early Identification and Intervention

  C Yoshinaga-Itano•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2003

  Incluir item

• Beyond the liberal subject

  Open Access•Peter Bartlett•Human Rights Law Review•2025

  Incluir item

• Health equity for persons with disabilities

  Open Access•Mélanie Gréaux, Maria Francesca Moro et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2023

  Incluir item

• The Right to Health in International Human Rights Law

  Open Access•Virginia A Leary•Health and Human Rights•1994

  Incluir item

• The Right to Health Under International Law and Its Relevance to the United States

  Alicia Ely Yamin•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  Incluir item

• The Concept of Access

  Roy Penchansky, J W Thomas•Medical Care•1981

  Incluir item

• If Only for a Day

  Open Access•Kathryn Mcneilly•Human Rights Law Review•2023

  Incluir item