Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Validation of Global Self-Rated Health and Happiness Measures Among Older People in the Yilan Study, Taiwan

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22089258
AutoresYen-Huai Lin (0000-0003-1263-816X, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University), Hsi‐Chung Chen (0000-0003-3191-0093, National Taiwan University Hospital), Hsi-Chung Chen, Nai‐Wei Hsu (0000-0003-1679-6122, National Yang Ming University Hospital, autor correspondente), Nai-Wei Hsu, Pesus Chou (0000-0002-5636-4853, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)
Ano2020
Volume8
Páginas346-346
Data de publicação2020-07-31
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2020.00346
PMID32850586
OpenAlexW3046333457
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas45

Background: Single-item measures of physical and mental health are feasible for older adults, but their validity for that age group is unclear. This study tested validity of a global self-rated health and a global self-rated happiness measure in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 3,982 men and women aged 65 or older in Yilan, Taiwan, provided data on global self-rated health and happiness using 100-point numerical scales. The Physical Component Summary of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 2) and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale were used to test the validity of the self-rated health item. The Mental Component of that 12-item scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were validators regarding the self-rated happiness item. Criterion validity was tested using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 2). Results: The correlations between the self-rated health and happiness measures and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (version 2) validators were positive and statistically significant, supporting convergent validity. Sufficient divergent validity was demonstrated through the negative and significant relationship between the self-rated health item and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale scores and between the negative and significant relationship between the self-rated happiness item and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Optimal cut-off scores for physical and mental health states depended on age and gender. Conclusion: The global self-rated health and happiness measures were validated. Cut-off scores for evaluating older adults’ physical and mental health should be age- and gender-specific

Anxiety · Convergent validity · Happiness · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Self-rated health · Clinical Psychology · Health and Wellbeing Research · Health disparities and outcomes · Health, psychology, and well-being · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Gerontology

  • Volunteering and self-reported health outcomes among older people living in the community

    Open Access•Hsiao‐Ting Chang, Hsi‐Chung Chen et al.•Quality of Life Research•2021

  • Self-rated physical and mental health among older adults 80 years and older

    Open Access•Pengpid, Supa Pengpid et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Associations of the Initial Covid-19 Lockdown on Self-Reported Happiness and Worry about Developing Loneliness

    Open Access•Vivian Isaac, Teresa Cheng et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • A Space-Time Analysis of Rural Older People’s Outdoor Mobility and Its Impact on Self-Rated Health

    Open Access•Tzu-Yuan Stessa Chao, Xiaoqin Jiang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Does exercise participation promote happiness

    Open Access•Chao Li, Guangjie Ning et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Can China's New Rural Cooperative Medical System Improve Farmers' Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Wenhao Qi, Fang Liu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • The effect of internet use on depressive symptoms in older adults

    Open Access•Lin Lü, Lu Lin et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • The Older, the Happier

    Open Access•Jia Li, D W L Lai et al.•Research on Aging•2022

  • Prediction of satisfaction indicators increasing the level of happiness

    Open Access•Simla Güzel, Ayhan Görmüş•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • Happiness Inequality in the United States

    Open Access•Betsey Stevenson, Justin Wolfers•The Journal of Legal Studies•2008

  • Quality of life in older ages

    G Netuveli, D Blane•British Medical Bulletin•2008

  • Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales

    Open Access•Luis Manuel Lozano Fernández, Luis M Lozano et al.•Methodology•2008

  • Age Differences in Self-Assessments of Health

    Ellen Idler, E L Idler•Journal of Gerontology•1993

  • Correlation Coefficients

    Open Access•Patrick Schober, Christa Boer et al.•Anesthesia & Analgesia•2018

  • Self-rated health. Comparisons between three different measures. Results from a population study

    Ingeborg Eriksson, Anna‐lena Undén et al.•International Journal of…•2001

  • Optimal number of response categories in rating scales

    Open Access•Carolyn C Preston, Andrew M Colman•Acta Psychologica•2000

  • The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Open Access•Ingerid Bjelland, Ingvar Bjelland et al.•Journal of Psychosomatic Research•2002

  • Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing

    Open Access•Andrew Steptoe, Angus Deaton et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Open Access•A S Zigmond, R P Snaith•Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica•1983

  • The Relationship of Anxiety and Depression to Subjective Well-Being in a Mainland Chinese Sample

    Open Access•Christopher Malone, Amy Wachholtz•Journal of Religion and Health•2018

  • Associations between Body Mass Index and Subjective Health Outcomes among Older Adults

    Open Access•Hsiao‐Ting Chang, Nai‐Wei Hsu et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status

    Open Access•Shunquan Wu, Rui Wang et al.•BMC Public Health•2013

  • Determinants of self-rated health among shanghai elders

    Open Access•Weizhen Dong, Jin Wan et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Assessing Measurement Properties of Two Single-item General Health Measures

    Open Access•Karen B Desalvo, William Fisher et al.•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures

    Open Access•Freda Cheung, Felix Cheung et al.•Quality of Life Research•2014

  • Measuring Happiness With a Single-Item Scale

    Open Access•Ahmed M Abdel-Khalek•Social Behavior and Personality…•2006

  • Predicting changes in perceived health status

    Marcus S Goldstein, J M Siegel et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1984

  • Age, time, and cohort effects on functional status and self-rated health in elderly men

    N Hoeymans, E J M Feskens et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1997

  • Self-assessed health among Norwegian adults

    Open Access•Torbjorn Moum•Social Science & Medicine•1992

  • Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle

    Open Access•David G Blanchflower, Andrew J Oswald•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties

    Open Access•G I J M Kempen, I Miedema et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1996

  • Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree-Disagree Scales

    Open Access•Melanie Revilla, Melanie A Revilla et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2014

Obras citantes distintas9
Citações por ano1,8
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 9
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae