Ensuring justice in global health education initiatives – a review of pearls and pitfalls
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22089407 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Aleksandar Stevanović (0000-0003-1091-3340, University of Belgrade, autor correspondente), Vesna Bjegović-Mikanović (0000-0002-8299-6555, University of Belgrade), Ulrich Laaser (0000-0001-5889-4471, Bielefeld University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Páginas | 1574917-1574917 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-05-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1574917 |
| PMID | 40552240 |
| OpenAlex | W4410792088 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 47 |
Global health education initiatives (GHEIs) include various educational programs and opportunities aimed at training a competent global and public health workforce to address major global health issues. Many GHEIs are led by institutions in high-income countries and fail to support the development of local educational capacities that would strengthen health systems and ensure a continuous supply of public health professionals. This analysis explores the barriers to equitable GHEIs, emphasizing the importance of justice-related aspects. Despite substantial investments in GHEIs in recent years, there is a risk of reinforcing existing inequities due to systemic injustice and power dynamics. We identify six key areas for improvement regarding these barriers: socioeconomic equity, gender equity, inclusiveness and disability justice, decolonization principles, sustainability and transparency, and the environmental footprint in education. We argue how enhancing each of these aspects can break down existing injustice and enable disadvantaged individuals to fully participate in GHEIs. Furthermore, we propose a set of indicators to identify and address common barriers during the design, implementation, and evaluation of GHEIs. Promoting equitable access, meaningful representation, and sustainable collaboration in GHEIs is an important step toward achieving global health justice and reducing dependence on foreign support
Business · Disadvantaged · Economic growth · Economics · Global health · Health equity · Injustice · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Sustainability · Global Health and Surgery · Global Maternal and Child Health · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Nursing
Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health
Towards applying the essential public health functions for building health systems resilience
Sustainability in global health
Barriers to decolonising educational partnerships in global health
Research for Health Justice
The feudal structure of global health and its implications for decolonisation
Misguided charity
How we classify countries and people—and why it matters
The use, misuse and overuse of the ‘low-income and middle-income countries’ category
Global health education in high-income countries
Decolonising global health
Decolonizing Global Health Education
Challenges, coping and support during student placement abroad
Exploring experiences of ableism in academia
Decolonising global health
From barrier to enabler
Contributing to health training in low and middle income countries – global health programmes' responsibility to be sustainable and impactful
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries
Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control
Integrating the United Nations sustainable development goals into higher education globally
Gaps in studies of global health education
Sustainability’ in global health
The Public Health Practitioner of the Future
How educational systems respond to diversity, inclusion and social justice
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |