The role of counseling for non-traditional students in formal higher education
A scoping review
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22163447 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Panagiota Stamou (0009-0002-4628-8719, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, autor correspondente), Konstantina Tsoli (0000-0001-6414-3172, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Thomas Babalis (0009-0002-1798-7123, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-05-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2024.1361410 |
| OpenAlex | W4399177333 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 38 |
Introduction Since the mid-20th century, the number of adult students enrolled in formal higher education (HE) programs has significantly increased. The profile of non-traditional students differs significantly from that of traditional students in terms of their characteristics, learning methods, obstacles and challenges, motivations for learning, and conditions for effective learning. Unlike traditional students, adult students often balance family, work, and educational responsibilities, necessitating a more nuanced approach to support and guidance. However, most HE institutions primarily serve the needs of traditional student populations, which results in limited support available to adult students. This scoping review aimed to explore and map the existing literature on the role of adult (or non-traditional) students counseling in the context of formal HE. Methods We focused on literature related to academic advising for non-traditional students in formal HE, restricting our search to both empirical and non-empirical articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2010 and 2022. Employing Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review method and the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, we searched four databases (EBSCOhost, Crossref, Semantic Scholar, and ERIC), supplemented by a manual search. Results Of the 1,330 articles identified and screened, 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. Our review included 17 empirical and eight non-empirical studies, with the majority conducted in the USA (21 of 25). Thematic analysis revealed five key research areas (or themes): academic advising practices, perceptions of advising, technology, and advising, advising models, and academic success. The most common research theme, advising practices for adult (undergraduate and doctoral) students, constituted 52% of the studies ( n = 13). Discussion Drawing from our analysis, we discuss current trends and future development in advising non-traditional students within formal HE settings. The added value of academic advising for adult students is explored, and any potential gaps in research literature knowledge are identified
Checklist · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Higher education · Medical education · Political science · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Education and Military Integration · Higher Education Research Studies · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development · Psychology
Scoping reviews
Thematic analysis.
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Skills and Competencies for Effective Academic Advising and Personal Tutoring
What student support practitioners know about non-traditional students
Communicating in Mentoring Relationships
Doctoral Students' Experiences with Pedagogies of the Home, Pedagogies of Love, and Mentoring in the Academy
Scoping studies
Nontraditional Adult Learners
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |