Bridging cognitive skills and environmental awareness
Critical and creative thinking as predictors of digital ecoliteracy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22166153 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Saberina Hasibuan (0000-0003-0546-2207, Riau University, autor correspondente), Yustina Yustina (0000-0002-4615-9688, Riau University), Resma Wahyuni (Riau University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1705676 |
| OpenAlex | W4416996000 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 42 |
Digital ecoliteracy, the ability to access, critically evaluate, and apply environmental information through digital platforms, is increasingly recognized as a critical competency for addressing twenty first-century sustainability challenges. This study aims to explore how critical and creative thinking predict digital ecoliteracy among Indonesian university students. Two independent samples of university students (Sample 1: N = 45; Sample 2: N = 60) participated in the study. The relationship between critical thinking, creative thinking, and digital ecoliteracy was examined using Pearson and Spearman correlations. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictive power of these cognitive skills on digital ecoliteracy. The analysis revealed that critical thinking had strong positive correlations with digital ecoliteracy ( r = 0.717–0.755, p < 0.01), while creative thinking showed moderate to strong correlations ( r = 0.233–0.709, p < 0.05–0.01). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that both cognitive skills significantly predicted digital ecoliteracy, jointly explaining 72–75% of the variance (Sample 1: R 2 = 0.721, β = 0.689 for critical, β = 0.394 for creative; Sample 2: R 2 = 0.750, β = 0.457 for critical, β = 0.592 for creative; p < 0.001). The results indicate that fostering higher-order cognitive skills such as critical and creative thinking is a robust pathway for enhancing sustainability-oriented digital competencies. These findings align with UNESCO's Education for Sustainable Development and the OECD's Learning Framework 2030, emphasizing the pivotal role of educators in facilitating digital ecological engagement. The study also highlights the need for mixed-methods research to explore the causal mechanisms underlying these relationships and addresses the limitations of a quantitative-only approach
Cognition · Creative thinking · Creativity · Critical thinking · Predictive power · Regression analysis · Digital literacy in education · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Sustainability in Higher Education
Conducting Educational Design Research
Design Research in Education
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Protocol Analysis
Preparing for Life in a Digital World
Education for sustainable development
Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern
Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential
Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges
The technology acceptance model (TAM)
A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning
Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms
A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences
Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration
Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature
Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?
Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
A Literature Review on Digital Creativity in Higher Education—Toward a Conceptual Model
Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy
Testing the Effectiveness of an Ecomedia Literacy Environmental Education Lesson
The media and the literacies
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
Facts Are More Important Than Novelty
Students’ Civic Online Reasoning
Phases of inquiry-based learning
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |