Assessing the Social Validity of the Safmeds Strategy From the Perspective of Teachers and Children

The Say-All-Fast-Minute-Every-Day-Shuffled (SAFMEDS) strategy promotes fluency across several skills and contexts. However, few studies have reported the social validity key stakeholders associate with using the strategy in schools. Assessing social validity may provide us with some insight into factors that may affect engagement, implementation fidelity, and persistent use of the intervention after the termination of a research study. Study 1 details the findings from a survey completed by teachers who have used the strategy in their schools ( N = 55). Using thematic analysis, we identified three themes: 1) factors that promote and limit progress, 2) confidence, and 3) inherent advantages of the SAFMEDS strategy. These themes encapsulate teachers experiences of implementing the strategy under the real-word conditions of the classroom and the accompanying advantages and potential challenges they face. Within study 2, we discuss themes arising from interviews with children ( N = 26) about their views and experiences of using the SAFMEDS strategy. These children had used the strategy with their teacher for one academic year to promote fast and accurate recall of arithmetic facts. Analysis of these transcripts revealed five further themes relating to children’s engagement with the strategy: 1) enjoyment, 2) data, 3) sense of achievement, 4) skills, and 5) home use. Collectively these themes have potential impact with regards to future training and support models for the SAFMEDS strategy

Cognitive psychology · Fidelity · Fluency · Mathematics education · Qualitative research · Recall · Thematic analysis · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Computer Science · Early Childhood Education and Development · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Psychology

• Practice-Based Research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH Roadmap

  John M Westfall, James W Mold et al.•JAMA•2007

  Incluir item

• Conducting Online Surveys

  Open Access•Martine Van Selm, Nicholas W Jankowski•Quality & Quantity•2006

  Incluir item

• Successful Qualitative Research

  John Jamieson, Braun et al.•QMiP Bulletin•2014

  Incluir item

• Raising the curtain

  Rivka Tuval-Mashiach•Qualitative Psychology•2017

  Incluir item

• Implementation Matters

  Open Access•Joseph A Durlak, Emily P DuPre•American Journal of Community…•2008

  Incluir item

• Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition

  Russell E Glasgow, Edward Lichtenstein et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2003

  Incluir item

• Using thematic analysis in psychology

  Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  Incluir item