A framework for comparing large-scale survey assessments
Contrasting India’s NAS, United States’ Naep, and OECD’s Pisa
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22168317 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Peter van Rijn, Peter W van Rijn (0000-0002-4865-9723, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, autor correspondente), Han‐Hui Por (Educational Testing Service), Han-Hui Por, Daniel F Mccaffrey (0000-0003-1196-5273, Educational Testing Service), Indrani Bhaduri, Jonas Bertling (Educational Testing Service) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-09-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2024.1422030 |
| OpenAlex | W4402825182 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 26 |
Large-scale survey assessments (LSAs) are important tools for measuring educational outcomes and shaping policy decisions. We present a framework for comparing LSAs to facilitate studying the impact of design choice on the precision of results, contrasting India’s National Achievement Survey (NAS), the United States’ National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), and the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Our framework focuses on four key elements: sampling design, assessment design, analysis methodology, and reporting. The notion of total survey error, which is the accumulation of errors across the four key elements, can be used for both designing and evaluating LSAs. As example, we compare statistics that are commonly (but not always) reported from NAS, NAEP, and PISA to summarize outcomes related to sampling, measurement, and reporting. Our examination reveals several key similarities and differences among the three assessments, thereby highlighting the nuanced ways in which each LSA is tailored to meet the specific needs of their purpose and the challenges they face
Cartography · Geography · Regional science · Agricultural risk and resilience · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Social and Economic Development in India
Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking
Estimating Population Characteristics From Sparse Matrix Samples of Item Responses
The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model
Randomization-Based Inference about Latent Variables from Complex Samples
The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys
The Total Survey Error Approach
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
The Determination of Sample Size
Total Survey Error
Total Survey Error
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |