Robots as Mental Well-being Coaches
Design and Ethical Recommendations
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22190826 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Minja Axelsson (0000-0002-1101-2539, University of Cambridge), Micol Spitale (0000-0002-3418-1933, Politecnico di Milano), Hatice Gunes (0000-0003-2407-3012, University of Cambridge) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 1-55 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2573-9522 • E-ISSN: 2573-9522 |
| Editora | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1145/3643457 |
| OpenAlex | W4391840620 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 82 |
The last decade has shown a growing interest in robots as well-being coaches. However, insightful guidelines for the design of robots as coaches to promote mental well-being have not yet been proposed. This article details design and ethical recommendations based on a qualitative analysis drawing on a grounded theory approach, which was conducted with a three-step iterative design process which included user-centered design studies involving robotic well-being coaches, namely: (1) a user-centred design study conducted with 11 participants consisting of both prospective users who had participated in a Brief Solution-Focused Practice study with a human coach, as well as coaches of different disciplines, (2) semi-structured individual interview data gathered from 20 participants attending a Positive Psychology intervention study with the robotic well-being coach Pepper, and (3) a user-centred design study conducted with 3 participants of the Positive Psychology study as well as 2 relevant well-being coaches. After conducting a thematic analysis and a qualitative analysis, we collated the data gathered into convergent and divergent themes, and we distilled from those results a set of design guidelines and ethical considerations. Our findings can inform researchers and roboticists on the key aspects to take into account when designing robotic mental well-being coaches
Grounded theory · Human–computer interaction · Qualitative research · Robot · Sociology · Thematic analysis · User-Centered Design · Applied Psychology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Learning to Act with Rainbow! Deep Reinforcement Learning for Biologically Inspired Autonomous Robots
A Longitudinal Study of Child Wellbeing Assessment via Online Interactions with a Social Robot
A decade of educational robotics
Vita
Indoor Human–Mobile Robot Encounters
Participant Perceptions of a Robotic Coach Conducting Positive Psychology Exercises
Social Robotic Surveillance and Manipulation
Concerns and Values in Human-Robot Interactions
Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students
The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation
Robots for Use in Autism Research
Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot)
Meta-analysis of qualitative studies
Ethics of healthcare robotics
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now
Social Robot Co-Design Canvases
Providing Immediate Hope to Survivors of Natural Disasters
Social Robots on a Global Stage
Making Social Robots More Attractive
User-Centered HRI
Mitigating the Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on Healthcare Workers
The ethical issues of social assistive robotics
Coaching and positive psychology
The Use of Digital Applications and Covid-19
A Survey of Using Vocal Prosody to Convey Emotion in Robot Speech
Mutual Shaping in the Design of Socially Assistive Robots
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The structure of phenotypic personality traits
Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 8 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |