Symbolic Interpretation of Animal and Hunting Scene Motifs in Persian Carpets from the Safavid Period

Animal and hunting motifs in Safavid carpets (1501-1736) served as complex symbolic systems that communicated religious, political, literary, and cultural significances concurrently. During the early Safavid period (about 1520–1620), religious symbols were very important. For example, in Sufi mysticism, the Simurgh represented the Universal Essence, while dragons symbolized evil. Their fight showed the eternal struggle between good and evil. Politically, chained beasts of prey, especially lions and leopards, symbolized governmental power and magnificence, while hunting scenes positioned the Shah centrally to showcase his symbolic authority in struggling with ferocious animals. By the third quarter of the 16th century (1550s-1570s), the dragon-slayer motif acquired specific diplomatic significance, appearing on textiles that served as gifts related to firearms negotiations and signifying recognition of legitimate kingship. Literary connections to the Shahnameh and Khamseh Nezami provided a mythical backdrop, while snakes exhibited semantic progression from positive functions in pre-Islamic eras to negative connotations in the Islamic setting. The evidence suggests that symbolic meanings were deliberately organized in hierarchical layers to convey distinct messages to court, religious, and popular audiences, utilizing visual puns and compositional arrangements to express nuanced interpretations through colour symbolism, figure placement, and literary references. Temporal evolution is evident: religious-spiritual symbolism prevailed while Shahs pursued Sufi mysticism, while diplomatic-political duties became more significant following the advent of guns about 1570, when designs displayed less dramatic intensity. This research investigates the symbolic architecture of animal and hunting scene motifs typically considered as Shikargah, analyzing their growth from the Safavid "Golden Age”. The studies' diverse geographic and temporal specificity, spanning from comprehensive coverage of the entire period to targeted analyses of 1520–1620, reveal both consistent symbolic frameworks across Safavid territories and context-dependent variations in emphasis and interpretation

Islam · Negotiation · Symbolic power · The Symbolic · Eurasian Exchange Networks · Islamic Studies and History · Ottoman Empire History and Society · Architecture

• Classification of Gurkani and Safavid Fabrics’ Motifs According to the Impact of Persian Art on the Region

  Open Access•Niaz Mirmobini, Hanieh Sheikhi Narani•Journal of History Culture and…•2021

  Incluir item

• Pre-Islamic religious motifs (550 BC to 651 AD) on Iranian minor art with focus on rug motifs

  Open Access•Ladan Abouali, Jake Kaner•HTS Teologiese Studies /…•2023

  Incluir item

• Hushang the Dragon-slayer

  Open Access•Galina Lassikova•Iranian Studies•2010

  Incluir item

• The interplay of art, literature, and religion in Ṣafavid symbolism

  Open Access•Schuyler Cammann•Journal of the Royal Asiatic…•1978

  Incluir item

• Religious Symbolism in Persian Art

  Schuyler Cammann•History of Religions•1976

  Incluir item