Impact mechanism of agricultural industry agglomeration on labour outflow directions in China
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22230608 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Xiangshuo Zhang, X M Zhang (0009-0007-9638-465X, Anhui Agricultural University), Lu Shen (0000-0002-0665-4465, City University of Macau), Shen Lu (0009-0004-9776-4169), Zihan Zhang (0000-0003-0976-1845, Anhui Agricultural University), Yan Lu (0000-0002-6757-5533, Anhui Agricultural University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-025-05317-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4411930353 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 26 |
In recent years, significant agglomeration in China’s agricultural industry has led to changes in the flow of various resources. Labour, as an important production resource, naturally flows in response to the development of agricultural industry agglomeration. This study focuses on the impact of agricultural industrial agglomeration on the direction of labour outflow in China and its mechanism of action, explores the heterogeneity of the direction of labour outflow in the four major regions of China. This study uses a time-individual fixed effects model and multiple regression analysis. The study uses panel data for 30 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and Tibet) between 2011 and 2022. The study finds that agro-industrial agglomeration is significantly and negatively related to labour outflow, indicating that agglomeration reduces labour outflow by increasing local employment opportunities. Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that agglomeration in the eastern region significantly promotes intra-provincial cross-county outflows but has limited impact on cross-provincial outflows; agglomeration in the western region inhibits cross-provincial labour outflows; and the northeastern and central regions show complex heterogeneity characteristics. This suggests that the agro-industry agglomeration effect provides more employment opportunities locally, thus reducing labour outflow. In terms of regional heterogeneity, agro-industrial agglomeration in the eastern region promotes intra-provincial labour outflow. However, its positive correlation with outflow from the province is not significant. In contrast, the western region shows a negative correlation, with agricultural industrial agglomeration suppressing labour outflows, especially between counties within and outside the province. The northeast and central regions exhibit more complex dynamics. Based on this, the study suggests that the eastern region should use industrial agglomeration to promote intra-provincial labour mobility, the western region needs to balance economic development and ecological protection, and the northeastern and central regions should formulate targeted and differentiated policies
Agriculture · Business · China · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Economies of agglomeration · Geography · Natural resource economics · Outflow · Physics · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis · Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
The Effect of Income and Wealth on Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Different Welfare State Regimes
Space Power in Inclusive Development
Labor out-migration and agricultural change in rural China
The impacts of high-speed trains on British economic geography
Education and allocative efficiency
Does transportation infrastructure construction promote population agglomeration? Evidence from 1838 Chinese county-level administrative units
Increasing Returns and Economic Geography
Well‐Being, Social Capital and Public Policy
Not so Harmless After All
Reforms, Investment, and Poverty in Rural China
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |