Text operators as dialogical mechanisms in judgments of the French Court of Cassation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22342129
AutoresAnna Dolata-Zaród (0000-0001-8120-191X, University of Silesia in Katowice, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume11
Fascículo2
Páginas173-199
Data de publicação2021-07-22
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLanguage and Dialogue (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2210-4119 • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
EditoraJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/ld.00096.dol
OpenAlexW3170531664
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas37

The aim of this article is to present text markers as a dialogical mechanism in the French language used in a legal setting. The dialogue between the court and the public administration takes place primarily through a judgment’s justification. On the other hand, the dialogue between the authorities and the court takes place in two possible variants: as a response to the parties allegations raised in the complaint or cassation complaint or as arguments formulated in the cassation complaint. Analyzing the decisions issued by the French Cour de cassation , one may notice that this material is characterized by three aspects: intentional, conventional and institutional, as it refers to a set of established beliefs about the nature of the world of a given community

Administrative court · Complaint · Dialogical self · Notice · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · linguistics and terminology studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices