Doing good by proxy
Human-Animal Kinship and the 'Donation' of Canine Blood
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2249236 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vanessa Ashall (0000-0002-5263-2339, Centre for Applied Bioethics School of Veterinary Medicine and Science University of Nottingham, autor correspondente), Pru Hobson-West (0000-0001-6105-0747, Centre for Applied Bioethics School of Veterinary Medicine and Science University of Nottingham) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 908-922 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12534 |
| PMID | 28164318 |
| OpenAlex | W2556289268 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 29 |
This article demonstrates the relevance of animals to medical sociology by arguing that pet owners' accounts of veterinary decision-making can highlight key sociological themes which are important to both human and animal health. Based on semi-structured interviews, the article argues that interspecies 'kinship' allows for the extension of sociological claims regarding altruism, self-interest and mutuality from human blood donation to companion animal blood 'donation'. Furthermore, this study extends sociological understanding of the human-animal bond by showing how the dog's status as kin meant they were expected to donate blood, and that the act of donation itself represents an important opportunity for family 'display'. However, owners who do not or cannot donate blood themselves describe pet blood donation as an opportunity to lessen associated feelings of guilt or obligation through 'doing good by proxy'. These findings raise critical sociological and ethical questions concerning the risks and benefits of donation, and for how we understand third-party decision making. Finally, the article argues for the close entanglement of human and animal health, and concludes that sociologists of health and medicine should explore the radical possibility that decision-making in healthcare more generally might be influenced by experiences at the veterinary clinic, and vice versa. (A Virtual Abstract of this paper can be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_979cmCmR9rLrKuD7z0ycA
Altruism (biology · Blood donor · Donation · Feeling · Kinship · Obligation · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Anthropology · Blood donation and transfusion practices · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Members only? A posthuman view of otherthanhuman-animal immigrants across human-defined borders
Multi-species dementia studies
For an Emancipatory Animal Sociology
Covid companions
From more-than-human solidarity to multi-species biographical value
Animals, veterinarians and the sociology of diagnosis
Kinship Health Relationships
Accounts, Interviews and Observations
Biosamples as gifts? How participants in biobanking projects talk about donation
A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions
Beasts and boundaries
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Negotiating Value
It takes three to tango
Animal behaviours, post-human lives
Animals and Anomalies
Managing Pet Owners' Guilt and Grief in Veterinary Euthanasia Encounters
Being Alongside
Animals Just Love You as You Are
Displaying Families
Expanding the conceptual toolkit of organ gifting
On interviewing people with pets
Negotiating identity at the intersection of paediatric and genetic medicine
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,88 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |