Contesting lifestyle risk and gendering coronary candidacy
Lay epidemiology of heart disease in Finland in the 1970s
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2249244 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mikko Jauho (0000-0002-6999-6788, Department of Economic and Political Studies University of Helsinki Finland, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Fascículo | 7 |
| Páginas | 1005-1018 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12542 |
| PMID | 28236330 |
| OpenAlex | W2591100204 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
This study addresses two issues currently under critical discussion in the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), the relative neglect of women and the individualised nature of key risk factors. It focuses on the North Karelia project (NKP), a community programme aimed at coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention in a predominantly rural Finnish region in the early 1970s, that is, during a period when the epidemiological understanding of CVD still was relatively new and actively promoted. Adopting the notions of lay epidemiology and coronary candidacy, culturally mediated explanatory models lay people use to assess who is likely to develop heart disease and why, the study shows that locals targeted by the project critically engaged with both of these bias. Based on the rich materials resulting from project activities the study shows, first, how many locals subsumed the individualised and lifestyle-based approach to CHD prevention promoted by NKP under a more general framework emphasising the health effects of ongoing structural changes in the area, and second, how women constructed themselves as viable coronary candidates. The case supports the position in the current discussions on lay expertise that wants to integrate lay experiences more firmly into epidemiological studies and public health
Candidacy · Coronary heart disease · Disease · Neglect · Pathology · Political science · Public health · Epidemiology · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Historical and modern epidemiology studies · Medicine · Nursing · Obesity and Health Practices
Lay epidemiology and strategic ignorance in relation to HIV risk and testing
The North Karelia Project (1972–1997) and the Origins of the Community Approach to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Conceptualising the experience of health risk
Contesting state expertise after Covid-19
Revisiting Candidacy
Contextualising lifestyles
Whose Advice is Credible? Claiming Lay Expertise in a Covid-19 Online Community
Well, I knew this already' - explaining personal genetic risk information through narrative meaning-making
Epidemiology and the People’s Health
‘Give people work, and the blood pressure will sink’
Coronary heart disease
Enduring as a mode of living with uncertainty
Fragilities in life and death
Women and Men with Coronary Heart Disease in Three Countries
Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain
Becoming the Framingham Study 1947–1950
The Construction of Lay Expertise
The limits of lifestyle
Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD
Sneaky disease
Public health research and lay knowledge
The tenacity of the coronary candidate
Men, Masculinities and Heart Disease
Expert and lay participation in the construction of medical knowledge
Taboos and excesses
Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox
Causality, responsibility and blame - core issues in the cultural construction and subtext of prevention
A healthy lifestyle might be the death of you
Belief, knowledge and expertise
Invisible women? The importance of gender in lay beliefs about heart problems
Theorising Inequalities in Health
Psychosomatic subjects and the 'duty to be well'. personal agency within
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |