Detecting Deception

The research examined the relationship of available and used nonverbal and total information when observers make deception attributions during initial exposure. Twelve interviewees underwent a procedure designed to induce deception; this yielded six deceitful and six truthful interviewees, as reflected in behavior exhibited during a postprocedure interview. Eight coders estimated the amount of available nonverbal and total information. Eighty observers made judgments as to the veracity of the interviewees and reported the amount of nonverbal and total information used in making these judgments. Comparison of available information and used information models indicates inconsistencies in total information estimates and an inability to predict accuracy of judgments based on these estimates

Cognitive psychology · Deception · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Individual differences in judging deception

  Charles F Bond, Bella M Depaulo•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  Incluir item

• Nonverbal Cues as Linguistic Context

  Joseph P Folger, W Gill Woodall•Annals of the International…•1982

  Incluir item

• Interpersonal deception

  Judee K Burgoon, David B Buller et al.•Communication Monographs•1994

  Incluir item

• Broadening the deception construct

  Robert Hopper, Robert A Bell•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1984

  Incluir item

• Invited Article Fudging with Friends and Lying to Lovers

  Open Access•Gerald R Miller, Paul A Mongeau et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1986

  Incluir item

• Cognitive Biases and Nonverbal Cue Availability in Detecting Deception

  Open Access•Judee K Burgoon, J Pete Blair et al.•Human Communication Research•2008

  Incluir item

• Changing Conceptions of "Message Effects" A 24-Year Overview

  Open Access•Dale E Brashers, Sally Jackson•Human Communication Research•1999

  Incluir item

• Deception and Arousal

  Open Access•Mark A Turck, Gerald R Miller•Human Communication Research•1985

  Incluir item

• Self-Monitoring, Rehearsal, and Deceptive Communication

  Open Access•Gerald R Miller, Mark A Deturck et al.•Human Communication Research•1983

  Incluir item

• Changes in Language Behavior as a Function of Veracity

  Open Access•Earl F Dulaney, Earl Dulaney•Human Communication Research•1982

  Incluir item

• Equivocal Messages in Organizations

  Open Access•Linda L Putnam, Ritch L Sorenson•Human Communication Research•1982

  Incluir item

• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

  Open Access•Michael Greatorex•Wiley Encyclopedia of Management•2015

  Incluir item

• Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †

  Paul Ekman, Wallace V Friesen•Psychiatry•1969

  Incluir item

• Time-Limit Tests

  Open Access•Lee J Cronbach, Willard G Warrington•Psychometrika•1951

  Incluir item

• Communication Yearbook 30

  Christina S Beck•Communication Yearbook 30•2012

  Incluir item

• Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

  Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  Incluir item

• The Ability to Judge Truth-Telling, or Lying, From the Voice as Transmitted Over a Public Address System

  Paul J Fay, Warren C Middleton•The Journal of General Psychology•1941

  Incluir item

• Detecting deception from the body or face

  Paul Ekman, Wallace V Friesen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1974

  Incluir item

• Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying

  Robert E Kraut•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  Incluir item

• Detecting Deceptive Communication From Verbal, Visual, and Paralinguistic Cues1

  Open Access•John E Hocking, Edmund P Kaminski et al.•Human Communication Research•1979

  Incluir item

• Oral Communication Apprehension

  Open Access•James C Mccroskey•Human Communication Research•1977

  Incluir item

• An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct

  Open Access•Mark L Knapp, Roderick P Hart et al.•Human Communication Research•1974

  Incluir item