Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Responding Effectively to Customer Feedback on Twitter

A Mixed Methods Study of Webcare Styles

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22872008
AutoresMatteo Fuoli (0000-0003-3544-1095, University of Birmingham, autor correspondente), Isobelle Clarke (0000-0001-5541-6327, Lancaster University), Viola Wiegand (0000-0001-6746-6620, University of Birmingham), Hendrik Ziezold (TomTom International), Hendrik S Ziezold (TomTom (Netherlands)), Michaela Mahlberg (0000-0002-4598-8011, University of Birmingham)
Ano2021
Volume42
Fascículo3
Páginas569-595
Data de publicação2021-06-14
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoApplied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0142-6001 • E-ISSN: 1477-450X
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/applin/amaa046
OpenAlexW3096726532
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas11
Referências citadas54

Social media offer an unprecedented opportunity for companies to interact more closely with customers and market their products and services. But social media also present reputational risks as negative word-of-mouth can spread more quickly and widely through these platforms than ever before. This study investigates how companies respond to customer complaints on Twitter. We propose an innovative mixed methods approach (i) to identify the key features that mark the styles used by a sample of companies in their replies to customers and (ii) to determine the most effective strategies for responding to complaints. Our results reveal that an affective style, expressed through devices such as stance markers, emphatics, and amplifiers, elicits the most positive response from complainants, regardless of the formality of the message. The study advances our understanding of the features and effects of corporate social media discourse. It also provides business communication practitioners with linguistically grounded insights that can inform the development of appropriate strategies for dealing with negative word-of-mouth online.

Advertising · Business · Formality · Linguistics · Political science · Public relations · Sample (material) · Social media · Style (visual arts) · Word of mouth · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Marketing · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication

  • Communicating safety

    Open Access•Wanwen Wang, Eric Friginal•Applied Linguistics Review•2026

  • Thank you for reaching out

    Open Access•Valerie Creelman•Discourse Context & Media•2022

  • Discursive approaches to webcare

    Open Access•Sofie Decock•Discourse Context & Media•2021

  • How do AI and human users interact? Positioning of AI and human users in customer service

    Open Access•So-Yeon Ahn, Seonghoon Kim et al.•Text and Talk•2024

  • A Multi‐Dimensional Analysis of English Tweets by Chinese and American Automotive Companies

    Open Access•Yan Xu, Yilin Xu et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • The Emotional Valence Paradox in Social media

    Open Access•Mingyue Gu, Michelle Mingyue Gu et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • What verbal de-escalation techniques are used in complaint handling

    Open Access•Margot Van Mulken•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • Utilizing AI to manage rapport

    Open Access•Dongheng Yang, Ping Liu•Lingua•2025

  • Language Abstraction in Negative Online Customer Reviews

    Open Access•Feng Wei, Wei Feng et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Mapping the Field of Register Studies

    Open Access•Ya Sun, Qiong Wang•SAGE Open•2023

  • Emotional labor in webcare and beyond

    Open Access•Matteo Fuoli, Monika Bednarek•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • Intercultural communication

    Ronald Scollon, Suzanne B K Scollon et al.•Intercultural communication•1995

  • Discourse of Twitter and Social Media

    Michele Zappavigna•Discourse of Twitter and Social…•2012

  • Variation across Speech and Writing

    Open Access•Douglas Biber•Variation Across Speech and Writing•1988

  • Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences

    Open Access•Stephen S Tax, Stephen Brown et al.•Journal of Marketing•1998

  • Understanding online firestorms

    Jürgen Pfeffer, Thomas Zorbach et al.•Journal of Marketing Communications•2014

  • Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media

    Open Access•Friederike Schultz, Sonja Utz et al.•Public Relations Review•2011

  • Attentive Turkers

    Open Access•David Hauser, Norbert Schwarz•Behavior Research Methods•2016

  • A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers' Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts

    Open Access•James G Maxham, Richard G Netemeyer•Journal of Marketing•2002

  • The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior

    Open Access•Jeffrey G Blodgett, Donna J Hill et al.•Journal of Retailing•1997

  • Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments

    Open Access•Stefan Palan, Christian Schitter•Journal of Behavioral and…•2018

  • Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Gabriele Paolacci, Joan Chandler et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2010

  • Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable

    Open Access•Andrew F Hayes, Kristopher J Preacher•British Journal of Mathematical…•2014

  • Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication

    Open Access•Tom Kelleher•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling

    Isobelle Clarke•International Journal of Speech…•2019

  • Hotels׳ responses to online reviews

    Open Access•Yi Zhang, Camilla Vásquez•Discourse Context & Media•2014

  • Silent Orality”

    Open Access•Olga Soffer•Communication Theory•2010

  • The Pear Stories

    Deborah Schiffrin, Wallace L Chafe•Language•1981

  • Beyond the Turk

    Open Access•Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Penelope Brown, C Levinson et al.•Politeness•1987

  • Saying 'sorry

    Ruth Page•Journal of Pragmatics•2014

  • A model of trust-repair discourse

    Open Access•Matteo Fuoli, Cheryl Paradis et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2014

  • Giving offense and making amends

    Open Access•Victor Ho•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English

    Douglas Biber•Language•1986

  • Language style as audience design

    Open Access•Allan Bell•Language in Society•1984

  • Cutting through Content Clutter

    Open Access•Francisco Villarroel Ordenes, Dhruv Grewal et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2019

  • Crowdsourcing Consumer Research

    Open Access•Joseph K Goodman, Gabriele Paolacci et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2017

Obras citantes distintas11
Citações por ano2,2
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 10

Ferramentas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae