Using mixed methods approaches to study families and relationships

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2287401
AutoresM B Thomeer (0000-0003-2777-2628, Department of Sociology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA, autor correspondente), Mia Brantley (0000-0003-4922-5860, Department of Sociology and Anthropology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA), E M Hernandez (0000-0002-3295-4322, Department of Sociology Indiana University at Bloomington Bloomington Indiana USA)
Ano2024
Volume86
Fascículo5
Páginas1374-1392
Data de publicação2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Marriage and the Family (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-2445 • E-ISSN: 1741-3737
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jomf.12974
PMID39720014
OpenAlexW4391897591
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas60

Mixed methods research-methodologies that synthesize qualitative and quantitative approaches in the design, collection, analysis, and dissemination of research related to a specific topic or aim-is increasingly common, offering innovative empirical insight into families and relationships. We first elaborate on our definition of mixed methods research, emphasizing that there is significant heterogeneity within mixed methods approaches to studying families and relationships. Second, we discuss benefits of mixed methods projects within family and relationship research, including theory building and innovation. Third, we provide practical suggestions for designing and implementing a mixed methods project, highlighting useful resources for researchers as they develop research questions, plan designs, collect and analyze data, and disseminate findings. We emphasize the unique opportunities from abductive analytic approaches for mixed methods researchers and point to the need for reflexivity. Fourth, we consider common obstacles associated with disseminating mixed methods research and explain why family researchers need "mixed methods literacy" regardless of their research paradigm. Finally, we identify key areas of future growth for mixed methods researchers. We advocate that understanding mixed methods research has practical benefits, even for researchers not using these approaches. To cohesively build-and critique-our knowledge of families and relationships, family and relationship researchers across paradigms should be familiar with the basic tenets, strengths, and limitations of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research

Data collection · Data science · Dissemination · Empirical research · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Management science · Multimethodology · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Research design · Social science · Sociology · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science