Trace Ethnography, Affect, and Institutional Ecologies in the Distributed Records of a Plaster Model
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2289416 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Diana E Marsh (0000-0002-3340-8884, American Philosophical Society, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 111-129 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-09-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Museum Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0892-8339 • E-ISSN: 1548-1379 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/muan.12119 |
| OpenAlex | W2516277753 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 13 |
This article investigates the classification and record-keeping history of a medicine man model in the Wellcome Library archives and the Science Museum archives in London, and the multifarious ways that information is constructed or lost in the history of a museum collection. First, attending to the affective turn in information scholarship, I argue that people's relationships and idiosyncratic preoccupations are formative in the histories of records and yet obscured in them. Second, I argue that broader "epistemic cultures" and "ecologies of standards"-belief systems, histories of disciplinary thought, and institutional histories-are formative in the legacy of information systems. A "trace ethnographic" approach to the history of one ethnographic piece illuminated the formation of authoritative knowledge as it played out in the acquisition and classification of the object and its institutionalized records
Affect (linguistics · Discipline · Epistemology · Ethnography · Formative assessment · Linguistics · Object (grammar · Political science · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Communication · Digital and Traditional Archives Management · History · Law · Philosophy · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Citações por ano | 0,63 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Altamente citado | Não |