Corporate Identity inCitizens United

The United States Supreme Court's decision inCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission [2010]from the outset has been a contested, highly politicized case, where judicial interpretation affected more than just election finance law; the majority's opinion explicitly intervened in a wider political struggle over personhood and the boundaries of citizenship. This article moves beyond questions of legal doctrine to highlight the social-theoretical-political contexts of the decision and its consequences for anthropological understanding of American citizenship. I trace how the majority decision appropriated and reshaped a discourse of identity. In its first formulation in social movements, "identity" was offered as a positive basis for rights and inclusion; however, the Court's appropriation reformulated identity on a negative basis, barring both regulation and recognition of identity-based claims by the State. It also went further than a traditional liberal demarcation of rights by specifically attributing agency and authoritative representation to corporate speech. Drawing on previous theoretical discussions of the corporate form and American citizenship and personhood, this article concludes thatCitizens Unitednot only allowed for new corporate power in the political sphere, but actively worked against the flourishing of a more humane and inclusive American citizenship in ways that legal anthropologists may wish to address as a matter of theory as much as politics

Citizenship · Critical legal studies · Identity (music · Legal profession · Legal realism · Personhood · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Anthropological Studies and Insights · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Law · Law in Society and Culture

• Why Scholars of Religion Must Investigate the Corporate Form

  Open Access•Levi Mclaughlin, Aike P Rots et al.•Journal of the American Academy…•2020

  Incluir item

• Motorcycle taxis, personhood, and the moral landscape of mobility

  Open Access•Joe Doherty, Jacob Doherty•Geoforum•2020

  Incluir item

• Citizens United, citizens divided

  Open Access•Carol J Greenhouse•American Ethnologist•2018

  Incluir item

• Appropriating corporate personhood

  Open Access•Courtney Lewis•American Anthropologist•2025

  Incluir item

• Liquidated

  Open Access•Karen Ho•Liquidated•2009

  Incluir item

• Everyday Law on the Street

  Mariana Valverde•Everyday law on the street•2012

  Incluir item

• The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution

  Philip Corrigan, Derek Sayer•The Great Arch: English State…•2027

  Incluir item

• The Paradox of Relevance

  Carol J Greenhouse•Paradox of Relevance•2011

  Incluir item

• Reassembling the Social

  Bruno Latour•REASSEMBLING THE SOCIAL: AN…•2005

  Incluir item

• Rights, Persons, and Organizations

  Robert Bell, Meir Dan‐cohen et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1987

  Incluir item

• The Cunning of Recognition

  Elizabeth A Povinelli, George Steinmetz et al.•Cunning of Recognition•2002

  Incluir item

• Being Alone Together

  Leo Coleman•Anthropological Quarterly•2009

  Incluir item

• Hegemony and Hidden Transcripts

  Open Access•Carol J Greenhouse•American Anthropologist•2005

  Incluir item

• The Method of Hope

  Hirokazu Miyazaki•The Method of Hope•2004

  Incluir item

• Accidents of equity and the aesthetics of Chinese offshore incorporation

  Open Access•B Maurer, Sylvia J Martins et al.•American Ethnologist•2012

  Incluir item

• Neoliberal Agency

  Ilana Gershon•Current Anthropology•2011

  Incluir item

• Corporate Lives

  Leslie C Aiello, James F Brooks•Current Anthropology•2011

  Incluir item

• Corporate Lives

  Marina Welker, Damani J Partridge et al.•Current Anthropology•2011

  Incluir item

• Survival Odds

  Lochlann Jain, S Lochlann Jain•Current Anthropology•2011

  Incluir item