For Medicinal Purposes
Whose Advice Exerts Authority on Medical Marijuana
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2292147 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Luis Vila‐henninger (0000-0001-8871-3141, Aarhus University, autor correspondente), Luis Antonio Vila‐Henninger (Aarhus University), Lars Thorup Larsen (0000-0003-4100-5425, Aarhus University) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 529-547 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-08-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociological Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0038-0245 • E-ISSN: 1475-682X |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/soin.12563 |
| OpenAlex | W4384559444 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 42 |
Citizens are embedded in legal systems in which the authority of different experts is normally given preference over citizens' opinions about medical marijuana and other medical issues. Yet, citizens may reject expert authority if they consider themselves to be competent based on their knowledge or social position. Thus, we are led to ask: In the context of direct democracy, what forms of expert authority-if any-does a historically privileged subset of citizens recognize when reasoning about medical marijuana? Our analysis is based on rich-qualitative data that analyzes how white male citizens reason about a medical marijuana ballot initiative in Arizona. By using a comprehensive content coding of citizens' arguments about the ballot initiative, we analyze how this privileged subset of citizens reasons about following or ignoring various authorities on the issue of medical marijuana. The article uses an exploratory abductive analysis of secondary semi-structured interview data to understand citizens' reasoning on this issue and to expand theories of expert authority in direct democratic settings. We find a variety of different ways in which white male citizens accept or reject expert medical authority on medical marijuana in the context of Arizona Proposition 203 (2010
Advice (programming · Criminology · Medical advice · Sociology · Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Medicine · Nursing · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Professionalism
Consumerism in medicine
Data Analysis in Qualitative Research
Abductive Analysis
The Culture of Control
The End of the Golden Age of Doctoring
Big data, qualitative style
Economy and Society
Legislators and interpreters
Crisis of Authority
Qualitative Secondary Analysis
Authority
The Legitimation of Power
The Legitimation of Extrajudicial Violence in an Urban Community
Sentencing young minority males for drug offenses
Social Justification and Political Legitimacy
Vaccine Refusal and Pharmaceutical Acquiescence
From patient deference towards negotiated and precarious informality
Whose Advice is Credible? Claiming Lay Expertise in a Covid-19 Online Community
Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism
Neoliberal Mothering and Vaccine Refusal
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Abductive Coding
Flexible Coding of In-depth Interviews
Advice Not Safely Ignored
Introduction to the Special Issue
From Medicine to Health
Medical Authority under Siege
The Shifting Engines of Medicalization
Battles over 'unruly bodies
On interviewing people with pets
For a Sociology of Expertise
The Institutional Logic of Occupational Prestige Ranking
The 'Medicinal Cannabis Question
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |