Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

When Do We Think About Detection? Structural Opportunity and Taxpaying Behavior

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22934767
AutoresLoretta J Stalans (0000-0003-1568-1577, American Bar Foundation, autor correspondente), Kent W Smith (American Bar Foundation), Karyl A Kinsey (American Bar Foundation)
Ano1989
Volume14
Fascículo03
Páginas481-503
Data de publicação1989-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLaw & Social Inquiry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0897-6546 • E-ISSN: 1747-4469
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-4469.1989.tb00071.x
OpenAlexW1989094938
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7

Past studies have generally found that perceptions of the likelihood of formal and informal sanctions have lower explanatory power of noncompliance with laws than do internalized norms. Using data from two telephone surveys, we examined a situational characteristic, structural opportunity, that may prod individuals to think about the likelihood of detection from the Internal Revenue Service for underreporting income. Structural opportunity is the degree to which an individual's economic or social situation provides ways to avoid detection. Individuals with high structural opportunity perceived a lower likelihood of IRS detection and indicated that they were less likely to feel guilty if they engaged in tax cheating. Our data also suggested that some individuals with high structural opportunity may be in social networks which condone tax cheating. As expected, structural opportunity provided a condition under which individuals took into consideration the perceived likelihood of formal and informal detection in formulating intentions to engage in tax cheating. Our findings suggest that an examination of the interaction between situational and individual characteristics will provide a more complete understanding of decisions to engage in illegal behavior. Implications for deterrence theory are discussed.

Business · Cheating · Criminology · Deterrence (psychology) · Economics · Explanatory power · Internal revenue · Microeconomics · Opportunity structures · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Risk perception · Service (business) · Situational ethics · Corruption and Economic Development · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Marketing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Testing an Expected Utility Model of Corporate Deterrence

    Open Access•John Braithwaite, Toni Makkai•Law & Society Review•1991

  • Duty, Fear, and Tax Compliance

    John T Scholz, Neil Pinney•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Self-Presentation and Legal Socialization in Society

    Open Access•Loretta J Stalans, Karyl A Kinsey•Law & Society Review•1994

  • Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating

    Open Access•Henry S J Robben, Paul Webley et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•1990

  • Blending economic deterrence and fiscal psychology models in the design of responses to tax evasion

    Open Access•D John Hasseldine, K Jan Bebbington•Journal of Economic Psychology•1991

  • A Typology of Tax Compliance in Developing Economies

    Open Access•Xin He, Huina Xiao•Law & Policy•2019

  • Did the Tax Reform Act of 1986 Improve Compliance? Three Studies of Pre‐ and Post‐TRA Compliance Attitudes

    Open Access•Karyl A Kinsey, Harold G Grasmick•Law & Policy•1993

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano0,19
Intervalo de citações1990 - 2019 (30)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae