The Reality of Experts and the Imagined Lay Person

This article examines the role of lay persons in the thinking and working of experts in different fields at the borders of academic knowledge production. The status of lay persons has been studied in the Public Understanding of Science (PUS) research, which has shed light on the implicit assumptions of the deficit model that experts usually apply to lay persons. This deficit model has been consistently criticized for its inadequacy. The purpose of this article is not to contribute to this critique but to focus on the conceptions of the expertise of lay persons as a necessary prerequisite of science-based recommendations in the context of application. We call such conceptions 'imagined lay persons' (ILP). We argue that such conceptions fulfil a functional purpose in the interaction between different fields in knowledge societies, and that such conceptions should not be checked against some alleged essential features of lay persons. Based on four different case studies of science centres, environmental science and consultations, as well as state regulations of genetically modified organisms, the authors examine the image of these imagined lay persons and what role they play in expertise

Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management

• Past and Present Energy Societies

  Open Access•Knowledge Unlatched-Ku Select B, Knowledge Unlatched-KU Select : B Knowledge…•Past and Present Energy Societies•2012

  Incluir item

• Work–Life, Diversity and Intersectionality

  Open Access•Mustafa F Özbilgin, T Alexandra Beauregard et al.•International Journal of…•2011

  Incluir item

• Social Media as Tools of Exclusion in Academia

  Open Access•Franziska Thiele•M/C Journal•2020

  Incluir item

• Socially-distanced science

  Open Access•Rokia Ballo, Warren Pearce et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  Incluir item

• Information receivers or change makers? Citizen representations in co-created energy transition pathways

  Open Access•Satu Lähteenoja, Kaisa Savolainen et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2026

  Incluir item

• “The Citizen” as a Ghost Subject in Co-Producing Smart Sustainable Cities

  Open Access•Leika Aruga, Hilde Refstie et al.•Urban Planning•2024

  Incluir item

• Creating ‘Local Publics’

  Open Access•Udo Pesch, Nicole Huijts et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  Incluir item

• Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK

  Open Access•Julie Barnett, Kate Burningham et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  Incluir item

• Constructing the public in public perceptions research

  Open Access•Valerie Berseth, J Eric T Taylor et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2024

  Incluir item

• “It shouldn’t look aggressive”

  Open Access•Alena Bleicher, Pauline Häßler et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  Incluir item

• Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge

  Open Access•Kate Burningham, Julie Barnett et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  Incluir item

• Making electricity networks “visible”

  Open Access•Matthew Cotton, Patrick Devine‐wright et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  Incluir item

• Responsibility, rationality, and acceptance

  Open Access•Antonia Graf, Marco Sonnberger•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  Incluir item

• Experts on public trial

  Open Access•Anders Blok•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  Incluir item

• Scientific controversies in museums

  Open Access•Ana Delicado•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  Incluir item

• Italian parliamentary debates on energy sustainability

  Open Access•Sonia Brondi, Mauro Sarrica et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  Incluir item

• ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics

  Open Access•P Castro, Carla Mouro•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  Incluir item

• Social identities and risk

  Open Access•Anders Blok, Mette Jensen et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2008

  Incluir item

• The (co-)production of public uncertainty

  Open Access•Jack Stilgoe•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  Incluir item

• Predicting scientists’ participation in public life

  Open Access•John C Besley, Sang‐hwa Oh et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  Incluir item

• On some communicatively salient complexities of knowledge asymmetries in a jury trial

  Patrizia Anesa, Peter Kastberg•Text and Talk•2012

  Incluir item

• Strategies on personalized medicine and the power of the imagined public

  Open Access•Lotte Groth Jensen, M N Svendsen et al.•New Genetics and Society•2023

  Incluir item

• Risk, parental autonomy and the epistemic divide

  Open Access•Kellie Brandenburg•New Genetics and Society•2011

  Incluir item

• Consumer involvement in dietary guideline development

  Open Access•Kerry A Brown, Maria Hermoso et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2013

  Incluir item

• A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice

  Open Access•Christian Kerschner, Melf-Hinrich Ehlers•Ecological Economics•2016

  Incluir item

• Public technology

  Helmuth Trischler, Robert Bud•History and Technology•2018

  Incluir item

• Environmental destruction as (objectively) uneventful and (subjectively) irrelevant

  Ossi Ollinaho•Environmental Sociology•2015

  Incluir item

• Elusive publics in energy projects

  Open Access•Udo Pesch•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  Incluir item

• Creating transitions to electric road transport in Norway

  Open Access•Marianne Ryghaug, Marit Toftaker•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  Incluir item

• Expert habits of mind

  Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  Incluir item

• How stakeholders legitimate ‘acceptable’ national energy transitions through spatial imaginaries and imagined publics

  Open Access•Adam Peacock, Patrick Devine‐wright•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  Incluir item

• People and power

  Open Access•John H Armstrong•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  Incluir item

• Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States

  Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  Incluir item

• Who is the ‘public’ when it comes to public opinion on energy? A mixed-methods study of revealed and elicited public attitudes to shale gas extraction

  Open Access•Lorraine Whitmarsh, Yu Shuang Gan et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  Incluir item

• Public agency and responsibility in energy governance

  Open Access•T S G H Rodhouse, Udo Pesch et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  Incluir item

• Homes as machines

  Open Access•Catherine Cherry, Christina J Hopfe et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  Incluir item

• Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid

  Open Access•Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Carmel Lindkvist•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  Incluir item

• Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty

  Open Access•Regula Valérie Burri•NanoEthics•2007

  Incluir item

• Weathering Risk

  Open Access•Phaedra Daipha•Sociology Compass•2012

  Incluir item

• Trade-offs in expanding citizen participation in low-carbon transitions

  Open Access•Jani P Lukkarinen, Satu Lähteenoja et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  Incluir item

• Aiming for Social or Political Robustness? Media Strategies Among Climate Scientists

  Open Access•Sunniva Eikeland Tøsse•Science Communication•2012

  Incluir item

• Resource efficiency and the imagined public

  Open Access•L Sharp, Rachel Macrorie et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  Incluir item

• Imagining Ordinary Citizens? Conceptualized and Actual Participants for Deliberations on Emerging Technologies

  Maria Powell, Mathilde Colin et al.•Science as Culture•2010

  Incluir item

• An Empirical Investigation of Social Capital and Networks at Local Scale through Resistance to Lower-Carbon Infrastructure

  Carmel Anderson, Jacki Schirmer•Society & Natural Resources•2015

  Incluir item

• An Array of Deficits

  Kate Burningham, Julie Barnett et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2014

  Incluir item

• Disengaging citizens? Climate change communication and public receptivity

  Emmet Fox, H Rau•Irish Political Studies•2017

  Incluir item

• Creating energy citizenship through material participation

  Open Access•Marianne Ryghaug, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold et al.•Social Studies of Science•2018

  Incluir item

• The imagined scientist of science governance

  Open Access•Heidrun Åm, Gisle Solbu et al.•Social Studies of Science•2020

  Incluir item

• Technical frames of affect

  Open Access•Kah‐wee Lee•Geoforum•2014

  Incluir item

• Democratic Situations

  Open Access•A Barry, A Kuntsman et al.•Democratic Situations•2022

  Incluir item

• Imagining energy futures

  Open Access•Ingrid Foss Ballo•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  Incluir item

• Spatial imaginaries underpin community objections to shale gas exploration in the UK

  Open Access•Stacia S Ryder, Stacia Ryder et al.•Geoforum•2025

  Incluir item

• Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change

  Open Access•Gordon Walker, Noel Ca et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2010

  Incluir item

• Successfully Contesting the Policy Sphere

  Open Access•Paula Castro, Eunice Castro Seixas et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  Incluir item

• Constructing Communication

  Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Science Communication•2008

  Incluir item

• Qualitative Interviews With Science Communication Trainers About Communication Objectives and Goals

  Open Access•John C Besley, Anthony Dudo et al.•Science Communication•2016

  Incluir item

• Outreaching, Outsourcing, and Disembedding

  Open Access•Sara Heidenreich•Science Technology & Human Values•2018

  Incluir item

• Sublime technology and object of fear

  Open Access•Sara Heidenreich•Environment and Planning A…•2015

  Incluir item

• The Good, the Bad, and the Hands-on

  Open Access•Sally Eden, Christopher Bear•Environment and Planning A…•2012

  Incluir item

• The problem and the productivity of ignorance

  Open Access•Catherine M Will, Catherine Will•The Sociological Review•2020

  Incluir item

• Introduction to the Special Issue

  Open Access•Þórólfur Þórlindsson, Thorolfur Thorlindsson et al.•Acta Sociologica•2003

  Incluir item

• Interdisciplinary complexities

  Grahame F Thompson, Grahame Thompson•Journal of Cultural Economy•2016

  Incluir item

• Laudable aims and problematic consequences, or

  M Strathern•Economy and Society•2004

  Incluir item

• Studies in ethnomethodology

  Harold Garfinkel•Studies in ethnomethodology•1984

  Incluir item

• Misunderstanding Science

  Open Access•Alec Irwin, Helen Lambert et al.•Misunderstanding Science?•1996

  Incluir item

• Sorting Things Out

  G C Bowker, Susan Leigh Star•Sorting Things Out•1999

  Incluir item

• Between risk and precaution – reassessing the future of GM crops

  Sheila Jasanoff•Journal of Risk Research•2000

  Incluir item

• The place of people in our knowledge

  Open Access•Helga Nowotny•European Review•1999

  Incluir item

• The Dominant View of Popularization

  Open Access•Stephen Hilgartner•Social Studies of Science•1990

  Incluir item

• Re-Thinking Science

  Fletcher Linder, Joe Spear et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2003

  Incluir item

• Knowledges in Context

  Open Access•Brian Wynne•Science Technology & Human Values•1991

  Incluir item

• Managing Technology in Society

  Charles Jacobson, Charles E Jacobson et al.•Technology and Culture•1997

  Incluir item

• Configuring the User

  Open Access•Steve Woolgar•The Sociological Review•1990

  Incluir item

• The Sociology of Critical Capacity

  Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thévenot•European Journal of Social Theory•1999

  Incluir item