Beautifying the Ugly and Uglifying the Beautiful

The Paradox in Classical Arabic Literature

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23139212
AutoresGeert Jan Van Gelder (University of Oxford, autor correspondente)
Ano2003
Volume48
Fascículo2
Páginas321-351
Data de publicação2003-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Semitic Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-4480 • E-ISSN: 1477-8556
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jss/48.2.321
OpenAlexW2120818694
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas14

Normally, the function of poetry or rhetoric, according to writers on poetics and literary criticism, is to represent good things as good and bad things as bad. However, already in ancient Greece poets and orators delighted in perversely describing good or beautiful things as bad or ugly, and vice versa . The same is found in Arabic literature, where this ability was sometimes called the hallmark of excellence in a poet. Going against received opinion ( paradoxos ), which has been termed taghāyur in Arabic, is a favourite practice of several writers and poets, including al-Jāh&05B4;iz&05B4; and Ibn al-Rūmī. Another term for this phenomenon is tah&05B4;sīn al-qabīh&05B4; wa-taqbīh&05B4; al-h&05B4;asan , which is also the title of one of al-Tha ‘ālibī’s many anthologies, here discussed in more detail. In some cases the ‘paradox’ is put to subversive purposes; more commonly, it serves to show the poet's skill or wit.

Arabic · Art · Criticism · Epistemology · Excellence · Favourite · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literature · Poetics · Poetry · Rhetoric · Theology · Education and Islamic Studies · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Studies and History · Philosophy

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub