The Role of Intermediary Groups in Shaping Management Fashion
The Case of Knowledge Management
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 23163208 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Harry Scarbrough (0000-0002-3820-8339, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2002 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 87-103 |
| Data de publicação | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Studies of Management and Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-8825 • E-ISSN: 1558-0911 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00208825.2002.11043672 |
| OpenAlex | W1580168491 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 16 |
This article seeks to analyze the role of intermediary groups, specifically professional groups and consultants, in the development of management fashion. Consideration of that role highlights the need to develop the institutional perspective on fashion to encompass not only diffusion, but also episodes of theorization and institutionalization. Based on available evidence on the importance of intermediary groups in these episodes, a number of propositions are advanced as to their roles and activities, and the implications that these have for the development of fashion. These propositions are illustrated and explored by drawing on experience with the knowledge management (KM) fashion. Here, evidence on the activities of professionals and consultants highlights the interplay between the colonizing efforts of professionals and the commodifying activities of consultants. Both constituencies are seen as benefiting from the ambiguity of KM, in that it allows particular groups to pursue competitive differentiation through the development of their own interpretations. The analysis of KM's development suggests that the factors that promote the diffusion of a new fashion may in turn limit its translation into practice. The role of intermediary groups is important here. The collusive interaction between and among consultants and professional groups to promote their own versions of KM may have accelerated its diffusion, but it also had the effect of reducing the legitimacy of KM-inspired changes to a narrowly technological domain--thereby rendering them ineffective, on the one hand, but intensifying the fashion cycle, on the other.
Ambiguity · Business · Institutionalisation · Intermediary · Knowledge management · Legitimacy · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Fashion and Cultural Textiles · Management and Organizational Studies · Marketing
Professionalism Reborn
Theorizing Change
Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions
Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement
Knowledge and Organization
The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization
Boundary Spanning Individuals
Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
Rhetoric and Myth in Management Fashion
What's in a Fashion? Interpretative Viability and Management Fashions
The Fashion of Management Fashion
The consultants’ offensive
Leaning on lean
Colonizing Knowledge
War and Peace
| Citações por ano | 0,14 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2005 - 2018 (14) |
| Altamente citado | Não |