Cultural policy and Australia's national cultural heritage

In 2012 the Australian Commonwealth government was scheduled to release the first dedicated policy for culture and the arts since the Keating government's Creative Nation (1994). Investing in a Creative Australia was to appear after a lengthy period of consultation between the Commonwealth government and all interested cultural sectors and organisations. When it eventuates, the policy will be of particular interest to those information professionals working in the GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives and museums) environment. GLAM is a cross-institutional field which seeks to find points of commonality among various cultural-heritage institutions, while still recognising their points of difference. Digitisation, collaboration and convergence are key themes and characteristics of the GLAM sector and its associated theoretical discipline. The GLAM movement has seen many institutions seeking to work together to create networks of practice that are beneficial to the cultural-heritage industry and sector. With a new Australian cultural policy imminent, it is timely to reflect on the issues and challenges that GLAM principles present to national cultural-heritage institutions by discussing their current practices. In doing so, it is possible to suggest productive ways forward for these institutions which could then be supported at a policy level by the Commonwealth government. Specifically, this paper examines four institutions: the National Gallery of Australia, the National Library of Australia, the National Archives of Australia and the National Museum of Australia. The paper reflects on their responses to the Commonwealth's 2011 Cultural Policy Discussion Paper. It argues that by encouraging and supporting collecting institutions to participate more fully in GLAM practices the Commonwealth government's cultural policy would enable far greater public access to, and participation in, Australia's cultural heritage. Furthermore, by considering these four institutions, the paper presents a discussion of the challenges and the opportunities that GLAM theoretical and disciplinary principles present to the cultural-heritage sector.

Commonwealth · Creative industries · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Cultural policy · Government (linguistics) · Media studies · Political science · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · The arts · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Law · Museums and Cultural Heritage · Public Administration

• The future of digital archive collections

  Open Access•Jonathon Hutchinson•Mobile Media & Communication•2015

  Incluir item

• Creative Nation —A Policy for Leaders or Followers? An Evaluation of Australia's 1994 Cultural Policy Statement

  Jennifer Radbourne•The Journal of Arts Management…•1997

  Incluir item

• Metadata for all

  Open Access•Mary W Elings, Mary Elings et al.•First Monday•2007

  Incluir item

• Smithsonian Team Flickr

  Open Access•Martin R Kalfatovic, Effie Kapsalis et al.•Archives and Museum Informatics•2008

  Incluir item

• The Prime Minister and the Cabinet

  Stephen Buckley, John P Mackintosh•Parliamentary Affairs•1967

  Incluir item

• Think globally, act locally

  Günter Waibel, Ricky Erway•Museum Management and Curatorship•2009

  Incluir item

• Museum websites and museum visitors

  Paul F Marty•Museum Management and Curatorship•2008

  Incluir item

• From Multimedia to Digital Content and Applications

  Open Access•Tom O''Regan, Tom O’regan et al.•Media International Australia•2004

  Incluir item