Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework

Rationale and methods

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23315212
AutoresJodi Summers Holtrop (0000-0002-5301-4014, University of Colorado Denver, autor correspondente), Borsika A Rabin (0000-0001-9837-7866, University of California San Diego), Russell E Glasgow (0000-0003-4218-3231, University of Colorado Denver)
Ano2018
Volume18
Fascículo1
Páginas177-177
Data de publicação2018-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMC Health Services Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1472-6963 • E-ISSN: 1472-6963
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12913-018-2938-8
PMID29534729
OpenAlexW2804954393
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas59
Referências citadas42

BACKGROUND: There have been over 430 publications using the RE-AIM model for planning and evaluation of health programs and policies, as well as numerous applications of the model in grant proposals and national programs. Full use of the model includes use of qualitative methods to understand why and how results were obtained on different RE-AIM dimensions, however, recent reviews have revealed that qualitative methods have been used infrequently. Having quantitative and qualitative methods and results iteratively inform each other should enhance understanding and lessons learned. METHODS: Because there have been few published examples of qualitative approaches and methods using RE-AIM for planning or assessment and no guidance on how qualitative approaches can inform these processes, we provide guidance on qualitative methods to address the RE-AIM model and its various dimensions. The intended audience is researchers interested in applying RE-AIM or similar implementation models, but the methods discussed should also be relevant to those in community or clinical settings. RESULTS: We present directions for, examples of, and guidance on how qualitative methods can be used to address each of the five RE-AIM dimensions. Formative qualitative methods can be helpful in planning interventions and designing for dissemination. Summative qualitative methods are useful when used in an iterative, mixed methods approach for understanding how and why different patterns of results occur. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, qualitative and mixed methods approaches to RE-AIM help understand complex situations and results, why and how outcomes were obtained, and contextual factors not easily assessed using quantitative measures.

Data science · Formative assessment · Management science · Mathematics education · Multimethodology · Nursing research · Public health · Qualitative research · Sociology · Summative assessment · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Informatics · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Embedding Active Pedagogies within Pre-Service Teacher Education

    Open Access•Natalie Lander, Emiliano Mazzoli et al.•Children•2020

  • Co-Creating Organisational Health Literacy

    Open Access•Camilla Klinge Renneberg, Anne Sofie Dydensborg Rasmussen et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Engaging fathers(to-be)

    Open Access•Vibian Angwenyi, Richard Fletcher et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • The essential conditions needed to implement the Indigenous Youth Mentorship Program

    Open Access•Frances Sobierajski, Lucie Lévesque et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Qualitative methods in implementation research

    Open Access•Alison B Hamilton, Alison Brown et al.•Psychiatry Research•2019

  • Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (Epis) framework

    Open Access•Joanna C Moullin, Kelsey S Dickson et al.•Implementation Science•2019

  • Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework

    Open Access•Jodi Summers Holtrop, Paul A Estabrooks et al.•Journal of Clinical and…•2021

  • RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Russell E Glasgow, Samantha M Harden et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2019

  • A RE-AIM framework analysis of a sports club health promotion Mooc

    Open Access•Benjamin Tézier, Quitterie Lucas et al.•Health Promotion International•2023

  • Codesigning Covid-19 booster promotion materials in online workshops with long-term care staff

    Open Access•Kimberly C Arthur, Kanetha B Wilson et al.•Health Education Research•2026

  • Responding to the Global Pandemic

    Open Access•Susan Potter, Sarah Hotham et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2025

  • General practice referral of ‘at risk’ populations to community leisure services

    Open Access•Emma Bird, M S Y Biddle et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Test@work

    Open Access•Wendy Jones, Sarah Somerset et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Action 3

    Open Access•Byron Tibbitts, Alice Porter et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • A Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation of a Dementia-Friendly Congregation Program for Black Churches

    Open Access•Janelle Gore, Jamilla Toliver et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Implementing SMS reminders for routine immunization in Northern Nigeria

    Open Access•Chisom Obi‐Jeff, Cristina García et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Innovative cardiovascular primary prevention population-based strategies

    Open Access•Delphine Le Goff, Marie Barais et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among male sex workers in Mexico

    Open Access•Hemant Kadiamada-Ibarra, Nicola L Hawley et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Barriers and facilitators of a large clinical trial on prevention of HIV transmission through breastfeeding in Lusaka, Zambia

    Open Access•Anaïs Mennecier, Beauty Matoka et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • The Health Literacy in Pregnancy (HeLP) Program Study Protocol

    Open Access•Maiken Meldgaard, Rikke D Maimburg et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being

    Open Access•Robert B Shaw, Shane N Sweet et al.•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Healthcare leaders and professionals’ perspectives of the Icon programme to prevent abusive head trauma in infants

    Open Access•Julie M Brose, Julie Mytton et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • A Climbing (Bouldering) Intervention to Increase the Psychological Well-Being of Adolescents in the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon-Study Protocol for a Controlled Trial

    Open Access•Katharina Luttenberger, Charbel Najem et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Barriers and facilitators of implementing a community workshop series to mitigate maternal-child food insecurity

    Open Access•Kristen N Herlosky, Kristen Herlosky et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative

    Open Access•Maryam Gholami, Nicholas Jackson et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Implementation lessons learned from the University of California’s Diabetes Prevention Program Initiative

    Open Access•Tamra Loeb, Tamra Burns Loeb et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Impact of a surfer rescue training program in Australia and New Zealand

    Open Access•William Koon, Amy E Peden et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • The VA Rural Interprofessional Faculty Development Initiative

    Open Access•Sarah Keithly, Paige Perry et al.•BMC Medical Education•2026

  • Equipping future teachers with innovative strategies that increase physical activity in the classroom

    Open Access•Natalie Lander, Emiliano Mazzoli et al.•Frontiers in Education•2023

  • Developing a dissemination and implementation research agenda for aging and public health

    Open Access•Paul A Estabrooks, Russell E Glasgow•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-Echo Program Using the RE-AIM Framework

    Open Access•Sherry L Ball, Sherry Ball et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks

    Open Access•Diane K King, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability

    Open Access•Rachel C Shelton, David Chambers et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Status quo and problem analysis of cervical cancer screening program in China

    Open Access•Jingfen Zhu, Zhenghao Ge et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework

    Open Access•Danielle D'Lima, Tayana Soukup et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs

    Open Access•Rebecca Raeside, Allyson Todd et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Multilevel perceptions of the virtual delivery of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program on RE-AIM domains due to Covid-19 mandates

    Open Access•Tamra Loeb, Tamra Burns Loeb et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • A Qualitative Review of Barriers and Facilitators Identified While Implementing the Native Students Together Against Negative Decisions Curriculum in a Multisite Dissemination and Implementation Study

    Open Access•Caitlin Donald, Kavita Rajani et al.•Health Education & Behavior•2024

  • Circles ReBoot

    Open Access•Hannah Lena Merdian, Hannah K Bradshaw et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2025

  • Introducing a multicomponent staff training intervention to reduce antipsychotic medication

    Open Access•Azucena Guzmán, KATHARINE ORELLANA et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2024

  • Implementation Factors and Teacher Experience of the Integrated Nutrition Education Program

    Open Access•Emily Bergling, Divyani Pendleton et al.•Journal of School Health•2022

  • Foundations of the Alive National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation

    Open Access•Nizam Abdu, Caroline Robertson et al.•SSM - Mental Health•2025

  • Implementing and evaluating integrated care models for non-communicable diseases in fragile and humanitarian settings

    Open Access•Lavanya Vijayasingham, Éimhín Ansbro et al.•Journal of Migration and Health•2024

  • Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda

    Open Access•Allan Musinguzi, Joan Ritar Kasidi et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Sustainable support solutions for community-based rehabilitation workers in refugee camps

    Open Access•Bria Mitchell-Gillespie, Hiba Hashim et al.•Globalization and Health•2020

  • The Symphony of Consumer Partnering and Clinical Governance

    Open Access•Jodie Nixon, Emily Steel et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Specialty Crop Impacts on the Environment and Health in the U.S. Midwest

    Open Access•Whitney Fung Uy, Laura E Balis et al.•Ecology of Food and Nutrition•2026

  • Midline qualitative evaluation of an integrated health, livelihood, agriculture, and conservation program

    Open Access•Fikadu Mitiku, Fikadu Mitiku Abdissa et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2026

  • What does it take for healthy food retail programmes to be successful? Lessons learned in New York City

    Open Access•Felicia Setiono, Felicia J Setiono et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2024

  • Implementation of a regulatory food policy to reduce availability of energy-dense foods in Costa Rican high schools

    Open Access•Melissa L Jensen, William González et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2021

  • Using nominal group technique to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to improving uptake of the Prison Needle Exchange Program in Canadian federal prisons by correctional officers and healthcare workers

    Open Access•Nadine Kronfli, Lise Lafferty et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2024

  • Beyond effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Program (10-14)

    Open Access•Nádia P Pinheiro-Carozzo, Sheila Giardini Murta et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2021

  • Examining youth mental health promotion at scale

    Open Access•Caitlin Allen, Jeff Moore et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2026

  • Translational Science

    Open Access•Emily J Solari, Nicole Patton Terry et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2020

  • A Qualitative Study of the Implementation of Referral Coordination for Specialty Care Referrals in the Veterans Health Administration

    Anna Zogas, Varsha G Vimalananda et al.•Medical Care•2026

  • Community Implementation and Evaluation of the Chicago Parent Program

    Open Access•Robert T Ammerman, Cynthia Zion et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2025

  • Methodological Insights, Advantages and Innovations Manuscript Title

    Open Access•Leticia Chimwemwe Suwedi-Kapesa, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Qualitative Methods in Health Policy and Systems Research

    Open Access•Maxlne P Fisher, Mika K Hamer•Qualitative Health Research•2020

  • A mixed-methods evaluation of a culturally tailored maternal and child mHealth programme

    Open Access•Rosie Dobson, Melanie Stowell et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2025

  • Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in Health Sciences

    John W Creswell, Ann C Klassen et al.•PsycEXTRA Dataset•2011

  • Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness

    Edward H Wagner, Brian T Austin et al.•Milbank Quarterly•1996

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • The Cultural Adaptation of Prevention Interventions

    Open Access•F G Castro, Manuel Barrera et al.•Prevention Science•2004

  • Enhancing Treatment Fidelity in Health Behavior Change Studies

    Albert J Bellg, Belinda Borrelli et al.•Health Psychology•2004

  • Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

    Open Access•Avedis Donabedian•Milbank Quarterly•2005

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration

    Open Access•C May, Carl R May et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

    Avedis Donabedian•The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly•1966

  • A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

    Open Access•Adrianne C Feldstein, Russell E Glasgow•The Joint Commission Journal on…•2008

  • Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions

    Open Access•Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Christopher J Miller et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • Bridging Research and Practice

    Open Access•Rachel G Tabak, Rachel Tabak et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2012

  • The dynamic sustainability framework

    Open Access•David Chambers, David A Chambers et al.•Implementation Science•2013

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design

    Open Access•Sarah Lewis•Health Promotion Practice•2015

  • Doing Qualitative Research

    John Mcleod•Practitioner Research in…•1999

  • Qualitative methods for health research

    John Green, Nicki Thorogood•Choice Reviews Online•2009

  • The RE-AIM Framework

    Bridget Gaglio, Jo Ann Shoup et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • The Adaptome

    Open Access•David A Chambers, Wynne E Norton•American Journal of Preventive…•2016

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • The Adoption and Practice of Mixed Methods

    Open Access•Vicki L Plano Clark•Qualitative Inquiry•2010

  • Cultural adaptations of behavioral health interventions

    Manuel Barrera, Felipe G Castro et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•2012

  • The critical incident technique

    John C Flanagan•Psychological Bulletin•1954

Obras citantes distintas59
Citações por ano8,43
Intervalo de citações2019 - 2026 (8)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 57
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae