Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23316673
AutoresXiaodong Chen (0000-0003-2419-1836, Advanced Neural Dynamics (United States)), Frank Lupi (0000-0003-2287-2259, Advanced Neural Dynamics (United States)), Guangming He (Advanced Neural Dynamics (United States)), Jianguo Liu (0000-0001-6344-0087, Advanced Neural Dynamics (United States))
Ano2009
Volume106
Fascículo28
Páginas11812-11817
Data de publicação2009-07-14
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0027-8424 • E-ISSN: 1091-6490
EditoraNational Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1073/pnas.0809980106
PMID19564610
PMCIDPMC2703664
OpenAlexW2134301151
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas72
Referências citadas54

An increasing amount of investment has been devoted to protecting and restoring ecosystem services worldwide. The efficiency of conservation investments, including payments for ecosystem services (PES), has been found to be affected by biological, political, economic, demographic, and social factors, but little is known about the effects of social norms at the neighborhood level. As a first attempt to quantify the effects of social norms, we studied the effects of a series of possible factors on people's intentions of maintaining forest on their Grain-to-Green Program (GTGP) land plots if the program ends. GTGP is one of the world's largest PES programs and plays an important role in global conservation efforts. Our study was conducted in China's Wolong Nature Reserve, home to the world-famous endangered giant pandas and >4,500 farmers. We found that, in addition to conservation payment amounts and program duration, social norms at the neighborhood level had significant impacts on program re-enrollment, suggesting that social norms can be used to leverage participation to enhance the sustainability of conservation benefits from PES programs. Moreover, our results demonstrate that economic and demographic trends also have profound implications for sustainable conservation. Thus, social norms should be incorporated with economic and demographic trends for efficient conservation investments.

Biology · Business · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Endangered species · Environmental resource management · Investment (military) · Leverage (statistics) · Natural resource economics · Payment · Payment for ecosystem services · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Ecology · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Finance · Land Use and Ecosystem Services

  • An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance

    Open Access•Mark Stephan, Graham R Marshall et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • Ecosystem services management

    Open Access•Shuai Wang, Bojie Fu et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Communicating climate change

    Open Access•Susanne C Moser•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2009

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Xiaodong Chen, Andrés Viña et al.•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Integration across a metacoupled world

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Feedback of telecoupling

    Open Access•Hongbo Yang, Frank Lupi et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Interactions between payments for hydrologic services, landowner decisions, and ecohydrological consequences

    Open Access•Heidi Asbjornsen, Robert H Manson et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Food for thought-examining farmers' willingness to engage in conservation stewardship around a protected area in central India

    Open Access•Mahi Puri, Elizabeth Frances Pienaar et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Vanessa Hull et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Understanding the Effects of China’s Agro-Environmental Policies on Rural Households’ Labor and Land Allocation with a Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Model

    Open Access•Wang Ying, Ying Wang et al.•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2021

  • The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity

    Open Access•Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos, J Martínez‐alier et al.•Conservation and Society•2013

  • Opportunity cost, income structure, and energy structure for landholders participating in payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Jichuan Sheng, Hong Qiu et al.•World Development•2019

  • The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data

    Runsheng Yin, Can Liu et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

  • Seeing Polycentrically

    Open Access•William Blomquist, William A Blomquist et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • Governing Complexity

    Open Access•Dustin Garrick, William Blomquist et al.•Governing Complexity•2019

  • Payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Sarah Schomers, Bettina Matzdorf•Ecosystem Services•2013

  • China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency

    Open Access•Brett A Bryan, Lei Gao et al.•Nature•2018

  • Conservation and human behaviour

    Open Access•Freya A V St John, Gareth Edwards‐Jones et al.•Wildlife Research•2010

  • Impacts of tourism on support for conservation, local livelihoods, and community resilience around Maasai Mara National Reserve, Kenya

    Kathleen Krafte Holland, Lincoln R Larson et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2022

  • What role for environmental cooperatives in collective agri-environmental schemes

    Kristin Limbach•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2024

  • Community-based incentive coordination in payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Jichuan Sheng, Hui Wang•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2025

  • Adverse selection and severe design constraints in PES

    Open Access•Pedro Gasparinetti, Sven Wunder et al.•Ecological Economics•2026

  • Performance of community‐based tank irrigation system and its determinants

    Open Access•Sarujan Sathiyamoorthy, Kei Kajisa et al.•The Developing Economies•2023

  • The effect of fixed and growth mindsets on buying sustainable foods

    Hassan Rahnama, Peter T L Popkowski Leszczyc•British Food Journal•2022

  • Providing descriptive norms during engineering design can encourage more sustainable infrastructure

    Open Access•Tripp Shealy, Eric Johnson et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2018

  • Best Practices in Environmental Communication

    Paige Brown Jarreau, Paige Jarreau et al.•Environmental Communication•2017

  • Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance

    Open Access•R Costanza, Shuang Liu•Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies•2014

  • Can community-based governance strengthen citizenship in support of climate change adaptation? Testing insights from Self-Determination Theory

    Open Access•Graham R Marshall, Donald W Hine et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2017

  • Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation

    Open Access•Free de Koning, Marcela Aguiñaga et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2011

  • Spatial determinants of public forest subsidies

    Open Access•Xinran Shen, Jiayun Dong et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2026

  • Farmer preferences for reforestation contracts in Brazil's Atlantic Forest

    Open Access•Ryan C Richards, Ragan Petrie et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Balancing greenwashing risks and forest carbon sequestration benefits

    Open Access•Ram Ranjan•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • A Means-End Chain Approach to Explaining the Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices Certification Schemes

    Open Access•Yeong Sheng Tey, Poppy Arsil et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2015

  • Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Sandra J Geiger, Hirotaka Imada et al.•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • Consequences of actor level livelihood heterogeneity for additionality in a tropical forest payment for environmental services programme with an undifferentiated reward structure

    Open Access•Peter Newton, Elizabeth Nichols et al.•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Incentives for biodiversity conservation under asymmetric land ownership

    Open Access•Qambemeda M Nyanghura, L Biber-Freudenberger et al.•Ecological Economics•2024

  • Conservation Costs Drive Enrolment in Agglomeration Bonus Scheme

    Open Access•Ruth Huber, Astrid Zabel et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Matthew Cranford, Susana Mourato•Ecological Economics•2011

  • Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes

    Open Access•Coralie Calvet, Philippe Le Coent et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Social norms enable rural collective action

    Open Access•Kaitlyn Height, Sonia Graham•Agriculture and Human Values•2025

  • Nudging farmers to reduce water pollution from nitrogen fertilizer

    Open Access•Yuan Chai, David J Pannell et al.•Food Policy•2023

  • Weak Ties, Labor Migration, and Environmental Impacts

    Open Access•Xiaodong Chen, Kenneth A Frank et al.•Organization & Environment•2012

  • Dwelling in the biosphere

    Open Access•Benjamin Cooke, West et al.•Sustainability Science•2016

  • Modeling willingness to continue participation in payments for ecosystem services programs

    Open Access•Lingling Qiu, Shashi Kant et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2025

  • Identifying behavior change interventions with deep leverage

    Open Access•Marieke Cornelia Baaken, Bjørn Vollan•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Designing conservation-development policies for the forest frontier

    Open Access•Jason J Scullion, Kristiina A Vogt et al.•Sustainability Science•2015

  • Explaining and understanding environmental actions in Chinese agriculture

    Open Access•Geir Inge Orderud, Rolf D Vogt et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Does the use of eco-labels affect income distribution and income inequality of aquaculture producers in Taiwan

    Open Access•Hung‐hao Chang, Hung-Hao Chang•Ecological Economics•2012

  • Ecosystem services valuation in China

    Open Access•Shuang Liu, R Costanza•Ecological Economics•2010

  • Thou shalt not sell nature

    Open Access•Britt Stikvoort, Therese Lindahl et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • Self-selection bias in estimating the determinants of landowners' Re-enrollment decisions in forest incentive programs

    Open Access•Yohei Mitani, Hideki Shimada•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve

    Open Access•Alexandra Yost, Li An et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Green nudges

    Open Access•Christian Schubert•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Participation, income growth and poverty alleviation in payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Jichuan Sheng, Hui Wang•Ecological Economics•2022

  • Inter- and transdisciplinary approaches to population–environment research for sustainability aims

    Open Access•Diana Hummel, Susana B Adamo et al.•Population and Environment•2013

  • Responses to climate change and farming policies by rural communities in northern China

    Open Access•Sofie Sjögersten, Chris Atkin et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Agricultural landowners’ willingness to participate in a filter strip program for watershed protection

    Open Access•Felix Kwame Yeboah, Frank Lupi et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use

    Open Access•Ying Wang, Qi Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program

    Open Access•Madeline M Giefer, Li An et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Understanding the role of land attachment in the emergence of hollow villages based on the agent-based complex system framework

    Open Access•Qi Zhang, Cai Jin et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Willingness to accept for rewilding farmland in environmentally sensitive areas

    Open Access•Rubén Granado-Díaz, Rubén Granado‐Díaz et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Effects of conservation policies on forest cover change in giant panda habitat regions, China

    Open Access•Yu Li, Andrés Viña et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Effects of China’s payment for ecosystem services programs on cropland abandonment

    Open Access•Qi Zhang, Conghe Song et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Bringing the neighbors in

    Open Access•Sergio Villamayor-Toma, Sergio Villamayor-Tomas et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • How Human Household Size Affects the Habitat of Black-and-White Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) in Hongla Snow Mountain Nature Reserve in Tibet, China

    Open Access•Rui-Chang Quan, Yong Huang et al.•International Journal of…•2011

  • Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Xiaodong Chen, Qi Zhang et al.•AMBIO•2019

  • Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants’ land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program

    Open Access•Xutong Wu, Shuai Wang et al.•AMBIO•2021

  • Effects of Natural Disasters on Conservation Policies

    Open Access•Andrés Viña, Xiaodong Chen et al.•AMBIO•2011

  • Agent-Based Modeling in Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS)

    Li An, Alex Zvoleff et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2014

  • Paiements pour services environnementaux en Indonésie

    Open Access•Renaud Lapeyre, Romain Pirard et al.•Développement durable et…•2016

  • Agricultural land use doubled sediment loads in western China's rivers

    Open Access•Amanda H Schmidt, Veronica Sosa Gonzalez et al.•Anthropocene•2018

  • Social Norms, Behavioral Payment Programs, and Cooperative Behaviors

    Open Access•Maria Knight Lapinski, J M Kerr et al.•Human Communication Research•2017

  • Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources

    Open Access•Jules Pretty•Science•2003

  • Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Gretchen C Daily et al.•Nature•2003

  • China's environment in a globalizing world

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Jared M Diamond et al.•Nature•2005

  • Grain for Green

    Emi Uchida, Jintao Xu et al.•Land Economics•2005

  • Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Marc Linderman et al.•Science•2001

  • Species Distributions, Land Values, and Efficient Conservation

    Open Access•Amy W Ando, Amy Ando et al.•Science•1998

  • Biodiversity Hotspots and Major Tropical Wilderness Areas

    Open Access•Russell A Mittermeier, Norman Myers et al.•Conservation Biology•1998

  • Human population in the biodiversity hotspots

    Open Access•Richard P Cincotta, Jennifer Wisnewski et al.•Nature•2000

  • Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Shuxin Li et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities

    Open Access•Thomas M Brooks, R A Mittermeier et al.•Science•2006

  • Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy

    Open Access•Mathis Wackernagel, Niels Schulz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2002

  • Governance and the loss of biodiversity

    Open Access•Robert J Smith, Robert D J Muir et al.•Nature•2003

  • Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity

    Open Access•Paul J Ferraro, Agnes Kiss et al.•Science•2002

  • Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

    Open Access•Norman Myers, Russell A Mittermeier et al.•Nature•2000

  • The Struggle to Govern the Commons

    Open Access•Thomas Dietz, Elinor Ostrom et al.•Science•2003

  • Global Consequences of Land Use

    Open Access•Jonathan A Foley, Ruth Defries et al.•Science•2005

  • Social Influence

    Robert B Cialdini, Noah J Goldstein•Annual Review of Psychology•2004

  • Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems

    Open Access•Jianguo Liu, Thomas Dietz et al.•Science•2007

  • Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems

    Open Access•Peter M Vitousek, H A Mooney et al.•Science•1997

  • Social Norms and Economic Incentives in the Welfare State

    Assar Lindbeck, Sten Nyberg et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1999

  • Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires

    Open Access•Stanley Presser, Jennifer M Rothgeb et al.•Methods for testing and…•2004

  • Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity

    Open Access•Li An, Frank Lupi et al.•Ecological Economics•2002

  • Paying for Environmental Services

    Open Access•Simon Zbinden, David R Lee•World Development•2005

  • The Determinants of Temporary Rural-to-Urban Migration in China

    Open Access•Haizheng Li, Steven Zahniser•Urban Studies•2002

  • Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions

    Stanley Presser, Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • Social Norms and Economic Theory

    Open Access•Jon Elster•The Journal of Economic…•1989

  • Through Thick and Thin

    Open Access•K Korinek, Barbara Entwisle et al.•American Sociological Review•2005

  • Determinants of Migration Intentions in Hubei Province, China

    Open Access•Xiushi Yang•Environment and Planning A…•2000

  • Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•The Journal of Economic…•2000

  • Economic Analysis of Social Interactions

    Open Access•Charles F Manski•The Journal of Economic…•2000

  • The Evolution of Norms

    Jonathan Bendor, Piotr Swistak•American Journal of Sociology•2001

  • The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences

    Open Access•Robert D Dietz•Social Science Research•2002

Obras citantes distintas72
Citações por ano4,24
Intervalo de citações2009 - 2026 (18)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 58
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae