Immortality
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 23700563 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Karl Ameriks (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2000 |
| Páginas | 177-188 |
| Data de publicação | 2000-03-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | CHAPTER |
| Periódico | Kant's Theory of Mind (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editora | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0198238975.003.0005 |
| OpenAlex | W4248608712 |
| Open Library | OL6896281M |
| ISBN | 9780198238973 |
| Idioma | EN |
This is a relatively brief chapter, giving a concise review of Kant's position on this issue throughout his writings. On the one hand, Kant treats the topic as the defining ‘Idea’ and goal of rational psychology as such; on the other, he is highly critical of all traditional theoretical arguments for it. His harsh criticism of these arguments has been a major factor in misleading readers into thinking that he has equally incisive or negative views about other, much more qualified rationalist claims. The unique a priori argument for our immortality (as a ‘postulate’ of pure practical reason) that Kant endorses in his Critiques can be understood as a weakened variation of a series of arguments that he had presented in early works, and that came to have an ever more peripheral significance.
A priori and a posteriori · Argument (complex analysis) · Criticism · Epistemology · Immortality · Literature · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Philosophy
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |