Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Prolepsis

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23733596
AutoresMartin Salzmann (0000-0002-6153-3025, Leipzig University, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Páginas1-42
Data de publicação2017-11-24
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoOTHER
PeriódicoThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition (JOURNAL)
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom062
OpenAlexW4230957264
ISBN9781118358733
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas57

The linguistic term prolepsis refers to a construction where a structural complement of the matrix verb is semantically related to the predicate of an embedded clause. In an example like I believe of John that he likes Mary , the proleptic constituent John is related to the position occupied by the coreferential pronoun he .. At first sight one may take the proleptic constituent to be an argument of the matrix verb with the pronoun establishing an anaphoric dependency, but things are more complex. First, the construction is possible with a very wide range of matrix verbs, casting doubt on the argumenthood of the object. Second, a coreferential element is obligatory, which argues against a mere aboutness relationship. There is conflicting evidence concerning the base position of the proleptic object. On the one hand, there is solid evidence from anaphor binding and superiority that the proleptic object occupies an A‐position in the matrix clause. On the other hand, the proleptic object reconstructs into the complement clause. This suggests that the proleptic object originates in the embedded clause, but an analysis involving movement from the complement clause fails for conceptual (Improper Movement, Freezing) and empirical (selective reconstruction effects) reasons. It is proposed that these paradoxical properties follow if the proleptic object is licensed by predication. The complement clause involves a base‐generated operator which turns it into an open sentence. The coreferential pronoun is the variable bound by the operator. The proleptic object, then, is the subject of the predication. The relationship between the proleptic object and the silent operator involves ellipsis, as does the relationship between the operator and the coreferential pronoun. Ellipsis derives the (selective) reconstruction effects, and predication explains the necessity of a coreferential element.

Argument (complex analysis) · Complement (music) · Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Object pronoun · Predicate (mathematical logic) · Pronoun · Sentence · Subject (documents) · Verb · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Proleptic PPs are arguments

    Erik Zyman•The Linguistic Review•2022

  • From Prolepsis to Hyperraising

    Open Access•Magdalena Lohninger, Iva Kovač et al.•Philosophies•2022

  • Diagnosing Clause Structure in a Polysynthetic Language

    Ksenia Ershova•Linguistic Inquiry•2021

  • Re-analyzing ‘say’ complementation

    Open Access•Travis Major•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2024

  • There are no broad subjects in Standard Arabic

    Open Access•Muteb Alqarni, Mohammad Alanazi et al.•Linguistics•2023

  • The meaning of the tough-construction

    Open Access•John Gluckman•Natural Language Semantics•2021

  • Phases

    Klaus Abels•Phases•2012

  • Islands and Chains

    Cedric Boeckx•Islands and chains•2003

  • Connectedness and binary branching

    Richard S Kayne•Connectedness and Binary Branching•1984

  • Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations

    Open Access•Joanne Mccloskey, James Mccloskey•Derivation and Explanation in the…•2002

  • Identity Avoidance

    Henk Van Riemsdijk•Foundational Issues in Linguistic…•2008

  • Remnant stranding and the theory of Movement

    Sjef Barbier•Dimensions of Movement…•2002

  • Lectures on Government and Binding

    Noam Chomsky•Lectures on Government and Binding•1993

  • Wh -Expletives and Secondary Predication

    Open Access•Claudia Felser•Journal of Germanic Linguistics•2001

  • Arguments for successive-cyclic movement through SpecCP

    Marcel Den Dikken•Linguistic Variation Yearbook•2009

  • Bridge verbs and V2 verbs – the same thing in spades

    Open Access•Samuel Featherston•Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft•2004

  • Raising constructions in Haitian Creole

    Open Access•Viviane Déprez•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1992

  • Epithets

    Open Access•Joseph Aoun, Lina Choueiri•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2000

  • Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising

    Open Access•Idan Landau•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2011

  • Nominative Objects in Japanese Complex Predicate Constructions

    Open Access•Yuji Takano•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2003

  • Copy raising and perception

    Open Access•Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2012

  • Resumptive Pronouns in Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Yael Sharvit•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1999

  • Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese

    Open Access•James Hye Suk Yoon, James H Yoon•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2007

  • Turkish Copy-Raising and A-chain Locality

    Open Access•John C Moore, John Moore•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1998

  • Long-Distance Agreement And Topic In Tsez

    Open Access•Maria Polinsky, Eric Potsdam•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2001

  • Semantics in Generative Grammar

    Brogan Geurts, Bart Geurts et al.•Language•1999

  • Formal Principles of Language Acquisition

    C L Baker, Kenneth Wexler et al.•Language•1982

  • The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Rajesh Bhatt•Natural Language Semantics•2002

  • Morphological underspecification meets oblique case

    Open Access•Josef Bayer, Markus Bader et al.•Lingua•2001

  • A local approach to the Williams Cycle

    Open Access•Gereon Müller•Lingua•2014

  • Resumption in focus(-raising)

    Open Access•Judit Gervain•Lingua•2009

  • E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion

    Open Access•Paul Elbourne•Natural Language Semantics•2001

  • Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in Ā-Chains

    Ken Safir•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • The Syntax of Appositive Relativization

    Mark De Vries•Linguistic Inquiry•2006

  • On The Absence of Scope Reconstruction in Tough Subject A-Chains

    Nicholas Fleisher•Linguistic Inquiry•2013

  • Raising to Object out of CP

    Hidekazu Tanaka•Linguistic Inquiry•2002

  • This Construction Looks Like a Copy Is Optional

    Idan Landau•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation

    Glyn Hicks•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Altruism, Ā-Movement, and Object Agreement in Innu-aimûn

    Phil Branigan, Marguerite Mackenzie•Linguistic Inquiry•2002

  • Resumption Still Does Not Rescue Islands

    Dustin Heestand, Ming Xiang et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2011

  • Defects of Defective Intervention

    Benjamin Bruening•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • Resumption, Movement, and Derivational Economy

    Joseph Aoun, Lina Choueiri et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of raising

    Open Access•William D Davies•Language•2005

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano1,2
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae