Patients' and clinicians' experiences of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview
A mixed method study in a Swedish outpatient setting
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2395348 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Malin Idar Wallin (0000-0002-5382-659X, Karolinska Institutet, autor correspondente), Marie Dahlin (Karolinska Institutet), Lauri Nevonen (0000-0002-8598-4015, Örebro University), Sofie Bäärnhielm (0000-0002-5303-9166, Karolinska Institutet) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 542-555 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0041-1108 • E-ISSN: 0315-4386 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1363461520938917 |
| PMID | 32646300 |
| OpenAlex | W3042134135 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 15 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
This study is an evaluation of clinicians' and patients' experiences of the core Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in DSM-5. The CFI provides a framework for gathering culturally relevant information, but its final form has not been sufficiently evaluated. Aims were to assess the Clinical Utility (CU), Feasibility (F) and Acceptability (A) of the CFI for clinicians and patients, and to explore clinicians' experiences of using the CFI in a multicultural clinical setting in Sweden. A mixed-method design was applied, using the CFI Debriefing Instrument for Clinicians ( N = 15) and a revised version of the Debriefing Instrument for Patients ( N = 114) (DIC and DIP, scored from −2 to 2). Focus group interviews were conducted with clinicians. For patients (response rate 50%), the CU mean was 0.98 ( SD = 0.93) and F mean 1.07 ( SD = 0.83). Overall rating of the interview was 8.30 ( SD = 1.75) on a scale from 0 and 10. For clinicians (response rate 94%), the CU mean was 1.14 ( SD = 0.52), F 0.58 ( SD = 0.93) and A 1.42 ( SD = 0.44). From clinician focus-group interviews, the following themes were identified: approaching the patient and the problem in a new manner; co-creating rapport and understanding; and affecting clinical reasoning and assessment. Patients and clinicians found the CFI in DSM-5 to be a feasible, acceptable, and clinically useful assessment tool. The focus group interviews suggested that using the CFI at initial contact can help make psychiatric assessment patient-centred by facilitating patients' illness narratives. We argue for further refinements of the CFI
Debriefing · Empathy · Focus group · Medical education · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Rating scale · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Migration, Health and Trauma · Psychiatric care and mental health services · Psychology
Cultural Psychiatry Across (Cyber)Spaces
‘I Feel That There Is Someone Who Can Listen to Me’
Could the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview Hold Therapeutic Potential? Suggestions for Further Exploration and Adaptation Within a Framework of Therapeutic Assessment
Approaching “highly sensitive person” as a cultural concept of distress
The effect of the cultural formulation interview on therapeutic working alliance
Efficacy pilot study of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview in a specialized mental healthcare inpatient unit for adolescents in Norway
What information did the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interviews provide when used with Swedish-speaking patients in a psychiatric setting in Stockholm
The Cultural Formulation Interview as a clinical tool in the assessment of eating disorders
Unlocking asylum seekers’ voices
A qualitative analysis of the documentation of DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interviews with non-native speaking patients in a Swedish mental health care setting
Efficacy testing of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview for patients in vocational rehabilitation in Norway
A Quantitative Systematic Review to Evaluate the Favorability of the DSM -5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) on the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Clinical Utility for Clinicians, Patients, and Relatives
The Cultural Formulation Interview-Generating distance or alliance? A qualitative study of practice changes in Danish mental healthcare
Complementing standard western measures of depression with locally co-developed instruments
The Cultural Formulation Interview
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries
A meta-analysis of the risk for psychotic disorders among first- and second-generation immigrants
Does the Cultural Formulation Interview for the fifth revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) affect medical communication? A qualitative exploratory study from the New York site
Researching Society and Culture
Culture in la clínica
Qualitative Analysis of Cultural Formulation Interview
Implementation of the Cultural Formulation through a newly developed Brief Cultural Interview
Revising psychiatric diagnostic categorisation of immigrant patients after using the Cultural Formulation in DSM-IV
Use of the Cultural Formulation in Stockholm
The Healthy Immigrant Effect
| Obras citantes distintas | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 15 |