Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Weber's interpretive project and the practical failure of meaningful action

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2397934
AutoresSveta Klimova (Glasgow Caledonian University, autor correspondente)
Ano2012
Volume15
Fascículo2
Páginas261-278
Data de publicação2012-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEuropean Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1368-4310 • E-ISSN: 1461-7137
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1368431011423599
OpenAlexW2140802134
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas16

The practical failure to understand in conflicts, where participants routinely challenge each other's attribution of meaning, undermines the key assumption of the Weberian interpretive project: that the subject acts meaningfully. This article revisits Weber's concept of meaning as an object of understanding for a social scientist. Ascertaining the empirical fact of subjective attribution, as Weber advised, may not be sufficient when it comes to understanding action whose meaning is disputed. The article uses the example of E.P. Thompson's interpretation of eighteenth-century English food riots to show that the disputed empirical meaning is a product of rational understanding, which Weber would classify as dogmatic meaning. The social scientist fails to understand what the critic claims to: a failure to act meaningfully in cultural terms. Furthermore, because the subject acts meaningfully without fail, we close off the option of explaining conflict as a rational disagreement

Action (physics · Attribution · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Object (grammar · Sociology · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Psychology · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

    Alasdair Macintyre•New Social Theory Reader•2020

  • Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences

    Edward Shils, Max Weber•Max Weber on the Methodology of…•2022

  • The Claims of Culture

    Seyla Benhabib•Claims of Culture•2002

  • Conjectures and Refutations

    Karl Popper, Melitta Mew et al.•Conjectures and Refutations•2014

  • Economy and Society

    Claus Wittich, Guenther Roth et al.•Economy and Society•2013

  • Roscher and Knies

    Max Weber•Roscher and Knies•1975

  • Customs in common

    E P Thompson•Customs in common•1991

  • Challenging Codes

    Open Access•Alberto Melucci•Challenging Codes•1996

  • Langage et pouvoir symbolique

    Pierre Bourdieu, John B Thompson•Langage et pouvoir symbolique•2001

  • Economy and Society

    Max Weber•Readings in Economic Sociology•2002

  • Critique of Stammler

    Thomas Burger, Max Weber et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1978

  • The Rites of Violence

    Natalie Zemon Davis•Past & Present•1973

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

  • Introduction

    Open Access•François Dubet, Henri Lustiger Thaler•Current Sociology•2004

  • Resonance and Radicalism

    Myra Marx Ferree•American Journal of Sociology•2003

  • Movements and media

    Open Access•Ruud Koopmans•Theory and Society•2004

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae