Advancing the Speed and Science of Implementation Using Mixed-Methods Process Mapping - Best Practice Recommendations

Mixed-methods process mapping is a visualisation tool that identifies the steps, resources and personnel required to deliver a clinical practice, and has been previously used in an ad hoc manner to develop effective implementation strategies and solutions. To realise the potential of mixed-methods process mapping as an implementation tool, we aimed to develop and formalize the methodological steps and provide guidance for contemporary best practice approaches to using this approach for optimising implementation practice and research. Synthesising theory, evidence and expertise, we have identified 10 best practice recommendations and provide the first systematic framework for integrating mixed-methods process mapping into three core phases of health systems implementation, specifically: (1) engaging interest holders (and maintaining engagement), (2) identifying when, where, why, and to whom change is needed (and potential consequences), and, (3) identifying barriers and enablers, and co-designing implementation strategies. For each phase, we provide: (a) a rationale for using mixed-methods process mapping, (b) best practice guidance for combining mixed-methods process mapping with implementation practice and research, and (c) case studies exemplifying best practice. This article provides intelligence on mixed-methods process mapping to improve the consistency and quality of its use among implementation researchers and practitioners. We present a rationale, guidance, and practical tools for conducting mixed-methods process mapping to enhance the quality of implementation research and practice which can be used and adapted internationally. In doing so, it builds capacity and provides an opportunity for researchers and healthcare professionals to better understand and embed evidence-based innovations into health systems, improving service and client outcomes. Further research is needed to establish potential uses of mixed-methods process mapping to support other core components of implementation practice (e.g., adaptation), and to formally test the impact of this approach independently versus as part of a combination of implementation strategies

Best practice · Data science · Mathematics education · Multimethodology · Political science · Process (computing · Programming language · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Psychology

• Street-level bureaucracy and relational autonomy in HIV status-neutral care implementation

  Open Access•Linnea Evans, Kenneth Jaffe et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  Incluir item

• Traumatic loss, spiritual suffering, and healing pathways

  Open Access•Muhammad Rafli Anugrah, Nurul Alwiah et al.•Journal of Spirituality in Mental…•2026

  Incluir item

• The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

  Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  Incluir item

• Implementation science

  Open Access•Mark S Bauer, JoAnn Kirchner•Psychiatry Research•2020

  Incluir item

• Lessons from Complex Interventions to Improve Health

  Penelope Hawe•Annual Review of Public Health•2015

  Incluir item

• A refined compilation of implementation strategies

  Open Access•Byron J Powell, Thomas J Waltz et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  Incluir item

• The behaviour change wheel

  Open Access•Susan Michie, Maartje M Van Stralen et al.•Implementation Science•2011

  Incluir item

• An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist

  Open Access•Mark S Bauer, Laura J Damschroder et al.•BMC Psychology•2015

  Incluir item

• The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques

  Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2013

  Incluir item