Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Debunking Arguments in Ethics

Dados Bibliográficos

ID24163723
AutoresHeinrich Sauer (0000-0001-8039-0376, Utrecht University, autor correspondente), Hanno Sauer
Ano2018
Data de publicação2018-07-26
Open AccessNão
TipoBOOK
PeriódicoDebunking Arguments in Ethics (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditoraCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/9781108529181
ISBN9781108529181
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas34
Referências citadas118

In this crisply written book, Hanno Sauer offers the first book-length treatment of debunking arguments in ethics, developing an empirically informed and philosophically sophisticated account of genealogical arguments and their significance for the reliability of moral cognition. He breaks new ground by introducing a series of novel distinctions into the current debate, which allows him to develop a framework for assessing the prospects of debunking or vindicating our moral intuitions. He also challenges the justification of some of our moral judgments by showing that they are based on epistemically defective processes. His book is an original, cutting-edge contribution to the burgeoning field of empirically informed metaethics, and will interest philosophers, psychologists, and anyone interested in how - and whether - moral judgment works.

Epistemology · Sociology · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Permission to Dream

    Open Access•Paula Keller•Constellations•2026

  • Loosening the Need-Concept Tie

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • A Political and Ameliorative State of Nature

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • When Genealogy Is Called For

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • The Benefits of Reverse-Engineering

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • A Genetic History of Thought

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • Ideas Worth Having

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • The Uses of Intrinsic Value

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • Epigraph

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•The Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • The Normative Significance of Pragmatic Genealogies

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • Ideas as Remedies to Inconveniences

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • Why We Came to Think as We Do

    Open Access•Matthieu Queloz•Practical Origins of Ideas•2021

  • Moral Progress and Evolution

    Open Access•Eleonora Severini•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • No need to get up from the armchair (if you’re interested in debunking arguments in metaethics)

    Open Access•Dan Baras•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Disagreement and Doubts About Darwinian Debunking

    Open Access•Alexandra Plakias•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

  • Moral Knowledge Without Knowledge of Moral Knowledge

    Open Access•David Kaspar•The Journal of Ethics•2022

  • Genealogy

    Open Access•Julian Ratcliffe•European Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Moral Judgement and Moral Progress

    Open Access•Michael Klenk, Heinrich Sauer•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • Deontology and Utilitarianism in Real Life

    Open Access•Anita Körner, Roland Deutsch•Personality and Social Psychology…•2023

  • A moral critique of psychological debunking

    Open Access•Nicholas Smyth•Journal of Social Philosophy•2022

  • Defusing the Regress Challenge to Debunking Arguments

    Open Access•Shang Long Yeo•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • Online Misinformation and “Phantom Patterns”

    Open Access•Megan Fritts, Fernando Cabrera et al.•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Speciesism and tribalism

    Open Access•François Jaquet•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • A Bayesian analysis of debunking arguments in ethics

    Open Access•Shang Long Yeo•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Defensive debunking arguments

    Open Access•Declan O’Gara•Philosophical Studies•2026

  • Why the debunking threat won’t go away

    Open Access•Halvor Kvandal•International Journal for…•2023

  • Prospects for pure procedural moral progress

    Open Access•Betty Lane•Inquiry•2023

  • Thought experiments and experimental ethics

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler, Norbert Paulo•Inquiry•2024

  • How far can genealogies affect the space of reasons? Vindication, justification and excuses

    Open Access•Francesco Testini•Inquiry•2024

  • In Search of Greene's Argument

    Open Access•Norbert Paulo•Utilitas•2018

  • The Golden Rule

    Open Access•Nathan Cofnas•Utilitas•2022

  • The co-evolution of virtue and desert

    Open Access•Isaac Wiegman, Michael T Dale•Synthese•2024

  • The Epistemology of Debunking Argumentation

    Jonathan Egeland•The Philosophical Quarterly•2022

  • How Gene-Culture Coevolution can-but Probably did not-Track Mind-Independent Moral Truth

    Open Access•Nathan Cofnas•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023

  • Ethics

    J L Mackie•Ethics•1977

  • Moral Inferences

    Jean-François Bonnefon, Bastien Trémolière•Moral Inferences•2017

  • Living High and Letting Die

    Peter Unger, Peter K Unger•Living high and letting die•1996

  • Character as Moral Fiction

    Open Access•Mark Alfano•Character As Moral Fiction•2013

  • Warrant and Proper Function

    Alvin Plantinga•Warrant and proper function•1993

  • Natural Moralities

    David B Wong•Natural moralities•2006

  • How We Get Along

    Open Access•J David Velleman•How We Get Along•2009

  • The Expanding Circle

    Peter Singer•Expanding Circle•2011

  • Compassion Fade

    Open Access•Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic et al.•PLoS ONE•2014

  • Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1976

  • The neural basis of human moral cognition

    Open Access•Jorge Moll, Roland Zahn et al.•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2005

  • The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories

    Michael Stocker, Inc The Journal Of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1976

  • Morality as Cooperation

    Open Access•Oliver Scott Curry•Evolution of Morality•2016

  • Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

    Open Access•Michael Koenigs, L Young et al.•Nature•2007

  • The emotional basis of moral judgments

    Jesse Prinz•Philosophical Explorations•2006

  • A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value

    Open Access•Sharon Street•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • Person as scientist, person as moralist

    Open Access•Joshua Knobe•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain

    Open Access•Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Bra et al.•Nature Neuroscience•2008

  • Ethics and Intuitions

    Open Access•Peter Singer•The Journal of Ethics•2005

  • The essential moral self

    Open Access•Nina Strohminger, Shaun Nichol et al.•Cognition•2014

  • Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Simone Schnall, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • Racial Bias Reduces Empathic Sensorimotor Resonance with Other-Race Pain

    Open Access•Alessio Avenanti, Angela Sirigu et al.•Current Biology•2010

  • Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, E J Masicampo et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2009

  • Against Empathy

    Open Access•Jesse Prinz•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2011

  • The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Neuron•2004

  • Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality

    Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene•Ethics•2014

  • Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non‐Philosophers

    Open Access•Eric Schwitzgebel, Fiery Cushman•Mind & Language•2012

  • Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Piercarlo Valdesolo, David Desteno•Psychological Science•2006

  • Action, Outcome, and Value

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2013

  • Pushing moral buttons

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2009

  • A cognitive developmental approach to morality

    Open Access•Rhonda Blair•Cognition•1995

  • ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good

    Open Access•Guy Kahane, Jim A C Everett et al.•Cognition•2015

  • The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment

    Open Access•L Young, Fiery Cushman et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Beliefs About the True Self Explain Asymmetries Based on Moral Judgment

    Open Access•George E Newman, Julian De Freitas et al.•Cognitive Science•2015

  • Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action

    Open Access•Benjamin Libet•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1985

  • The Affective Dog and Its Rational Tale

    Peter Railton•Ethics•2014

  • Moral psychology is relationship regulation

    Tage Shakti Rai, Tage Shakti et al.•Psychological Review•2011

  • Understanding Libertarian Morality

    Open Access•Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva et al.•PLoS ONE•2012

  • Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Joseph M Paxton, Leo Ungar et al.•Cognitive Science•2012

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, L Young et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Crime and punishment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman•Cognition•2008

  • A Defense of Moral Deference

    Dan Enoch, David Enoch et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2014

  • XIV—Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology

    Gilbert Harman•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1999

  • On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements

    Open Access•Patrick Haggard, Martin Eimer•Experimental Brain Research•1999

  • The emotional dog and its rational tail

    Jonathan Haidt•Psychological Review•2001

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition

    Jonathan St B T Evans•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

  • Telling more than we can know

    Richard E Nisbett, Timothy D Wilson•Psychological Review•1977

  • An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Science•2001

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • Must Metaethical Realism Make a Semantic Claim?

    Open Access•Guy Kahane•Journal of Moral Philosophy•2013

  • Rationality and the Reflective Mind

    Keith E Stanovich, Keith Stanovich•Rationality And The Reflective Mind•2010

  • Social Psychology and Virtue Ethics

    Open Access•Christian Miller•The Journal of Ethics•2003

  • Moral Emotions and Intuitions

    Open Access•Sabine Roeser•Moral Emotions and Intuitions•2011

  • The Humean Theory of Motivation

    Michael Smith•Mind•1987

  • The Sources of Normativity

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard, Onora O’neill et al.•Sources of Normativity•1996

  • Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting

    Open Access•Yoel Inbar, David A Pizarro et al.•Social Psychological and…•2012

  • Defending Moral Realism from Empirical Evidence of Disagreement

    C D Meyers, Christopher Meyers•Social Theory and Practice•2013

  • The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • Famine, Affluence, and Morality

    Peter Singer•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • The Geography of Morals

    Owen Flanagan, Owen J Flanagan•The geography of morals•2016

  • In the Beginning Was the Deed

    Bernard Williams, BernardHG Williams et al.•In the Beginning Was the Deed•2009

  • The logic of social exchange

    Open Access•Leda Cosmides•Cognition•1989

  • Constructed Criteria

    Open Access•Eric Luis Uhlmann, Geoffrey L Cohen•Psychological Science•2005

  • Objectivism and Prospectivism About Rightness

    Open Access•Elinor Mason•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2013

  • Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism and Moral Knowledge

    Open Access•Russ Shafer-Landau, Russ Shafer‐landau•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2013

  • On Doing Things Intentionally

    Open Access•Florian Cova, Emmanuel Dupoux et al.•Mind & Language•2012

  • The Possibility of Practical Reason

    J David Velleman•Ethics•1996

  • The Emotional Construction of Morals

    Jesse Prinz•Emotional Construction of Morals•2009

  • Reasons and Persons

    Derek Parfit•Reasons and persons•1986

  • The Masturbation Taboo and the Rise of Routine Male Circumcision

    Robert Darby•Journal of Social History•2003

  • Normative Ethics and the Prospects of an Empirical Contribution to Assessment of Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism

    Open Access•Andrew Sneddon•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2009

  • Does emotion mediate the relationship between an action's moral status and its intentional status? Neuropsychological evidence

    L Young, Fiery Cushman et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006

  • The Folk Concepts of Intention and Intentional Action

    Joshua Knobe, Arudra Burra•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2006

  • Moral Knowledge by Perception 1

    Open Access•Sarah Mcgrath•Philosophical Perspectives•2004

  • Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting

    Open Access•Kate Abramson•Philosophical Perspectives•2014

  • The Archimedean Urge

    Open Access•Amia Srinivasan•Philosophical Perspectives•2015

  • Off Her Trolley? Frances Kamm and the Metaphysics of Morality

    Open Access•Alastair Norcro•Utilitas•2008

  • Unequal Vividness and Double Effect

    Open Access•Neil Sinhababu•Utilitas•2013

  • Tracing the threads

    Open Access•Spassena P Koleva, Spassena Koleva et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2012

  • The neuroscientific study of free will

    Open Access•Markus E Schlosser•Synthese•2014

  • How not to test for philosophical expertise

    Open Access•Regina Rini, Regina A Rini•Synthese•2015

  • Moral Relativism Defended

    Gilbert Harman•The Philosophical Review•1975

  • Toward Fin de siecle Ethics

    Stephen Darwall, Allan Gibbard et al.•The Philosophical Review•1992

  • Moral Explanation and Moral Objectivity

    Peter Railton, Gilbert Harman et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1998

  • A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research

    Open Access•Jonathan McGuire, Robyn Langdon et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Darwin and moral realism

    Open Access•Knut Olav Skarsaune•Philosophical Studies•2009

  • Revolutionary Expressivism

    Open Access•Kohler, Sebastian Köhler et al.•Ratio•2013

  • Moral realism and the sceptical arguments from disagreement and queerness

    David O Brink•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1984

  • Evolution and Impartiality

    Guy Kahane•Ethics•2013

  • Ethics Without Principles

    Jonathan Dancy•Ethics without principles•2004

  • The Good in the Right

    Robert Audi•Good in the Right•2005

  • Neuroscience and Moral Reasoning

    Open Access•F M Kamm•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

  • From Jerusalem to Jericho

    John M Darley, Christie D Batson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973

  • Fieldwork in Familiar Places

    Michele M Moody-Adams•Fieldwork in Familiar Places•2002

  • Varieties of moral personality

    Owen J Flanagan•Varieties of moral personality•1991

  • The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience

    Open Access•Selim Berker•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2009

  • Effect of feeling good on helping

    Alice M Isen, Paula F Levin•Journal of Personality and Social…•1972

  • Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations

    J Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

Obras citantes distintas34
Citações por ano4,25
Intervalo de citações2018 - 2026 (9)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 33
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae