Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Nature of Lithic Reduction and Lithic Analysis

Stage Typologies Revisited

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2575561
AutoresKenneth C Rozen (University of Arizona, autor correspondente), Alan P Sullivan (University of Cincinnati)
Ano1989
Volume54
Fascículo1
Páginas179-184
Data de publicação1989-01-01
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Antiquity (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-7316 • E-ISSN: 2325-5064
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/281342
OpenAlexW2335126067
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas17

Ensor and Roemer (1989) claim that our debitage categories inherently are linked to our interpretations (i.e., are not interpretation free), that we have dismissed unfairly the work of lithic analysts who use stage typologies, and that our view of lithic reduction as a continuum is questionable. In responding, we review the descriptive and interpretive limitations of stage approaches, and explore terminological issues that arise from Ensor and Roemer's zealous adherence to stage approaches. Finally, we reiterate our position that approaches like ours, which seek to describe and interpret distinctive assemblages of lithic artifacts, are more likely to yield productive results than those, such as stage approaches, which focus on identifying distinctive artifacts

Archaeology · Debitage · Focus (optics · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Stage (stratigraphy · Typology · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Evolution and Paleontology Studies · Geology · History · Paleontology · Philosophy · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

  • Missing the boat in lithic procurement

    Open Access•Susan E Blair, Susan Blair•Journal of Anthropological…•2010

  • A stone in the hand is worth how many in the bush? Applying the marginal value theorem to understand optimal toolstone transportation, processing, and discard decisions

    Open Access•L Brock James, Kaley Joyce et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2021

  • Recent developments in the analysis of lithic artifacts

    Open Access•Richard W Yerkes, P Nick Kardulias•Journal of Archaeological Research•1993

  • The King’s Jasper Quarry, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Kurt W Carr, R Michael Stewart et al.•North American Archaeologist•2021

  • Quartzite and Vein Quartz as Lithic Raw Materials Reconsidered

    Chuntaek Seong•Asian perspectives•2004

  • Size and form in the analysis of flake debris

    Open Access•Michael Shott•Journal of Archaeological Method…•1994

  • Hits and misses when throwing stones at mass analysis

    Open Access•Andrew P Bradbury, Philip J Carr•Journal of Archaeological Science•2009

  • Technological Characterization of Lithic Waste-Flake Assemblages

    Robert J Austin•Lithic Technology•1999

  • Economic and Land-Use Implications of Prehistoric Fire-Cracked-Rock Piles, Northern Arizona

    Alan P Sullivan, Robert A Cook et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2001

  • Artifact Scatters and Subsistence Organization

    Alan P Sullivan•Journal of Field Archaeology•1995

  • A Method for Taxonomic Typology Construction and an Example

    Open Access•D Read, Dwight W Read et al.•American Antiquity•1996

  • The Reliability and Validity of a Lithic Debitage Typology

    Open Access•William C Prenti, William C Prentiss•American Antiquity•1998

  • Olorgesailie

    Glynn Llywelyn Isaac•Olorgesailie•1977

  • Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference

    COLLINS MICHAEL B•Lithic Technology•1975

  • Storage, Nonedible Resource Processing, and the Interpretation of Sherd and Lithic Scatters in the Sonoran Desert Lowlands

    Alan P Sullivan, Alan P Sullivan Alan P Sullivan•Journal of Field Archaeology•1983

  • Probing the Sources of Lithic Assemblage Variability

    Open Access•Alan P Sullivan•North American Archaeologist•1987

  • Stone Tools, Toolkits, and Human Behavior in Prehistory [and Comments and Reply]

    Daniel Cahen, Lawrence H Keeley et al.•Current Anthropology•1979

  • Behavioral Analysis and the Structure of a Prehistoric Industry [and Comments and Reply]

    Payson D Sheets, Payson Sheets et al.•Current Anthropology•1975

  • Hard rocks and heavy science

    Richard A Gould•Reviews in Anthropology•1976

  • New Light on the Tolchaco Problem

    Donald R Keller, Suzanne M Wilson•KIVA•1976

  • Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture

    M H Newcomer, Mark Newcomer•World Archaeology•1971

  • An analysis and application of the size distribution of waste flakes from the manufacture of bifacial stone tools

    David W Stahle, James E Dunn•World Archaeology•1982

  • Measurement, Method, and Meaning in Lithic Analysis

    Open Access•Kenneth C Rozen, Alan P Sullivan•American Antiquity•1989

  • Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation

    Open Access•Alan P Sullivan, Kenneth C Rozen•American Antiquity•1985

  • Unproductive Lithic Resources at Lake Mead

    Open Access•Kathryn A Kamp, John C Whittaker•American Antiquity•1986

  • The Production of Secondary Multiple Flakes

    Open Access•Arthur J Jelinek, B Bradley et al.•American Antiquity•1971

Citações por ano0,36
Intervalo de citações1993 - 2021 (29)
Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae