Henry George and the Shakers
Evolution of Communal Attitudes Towards Land Ownership
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2824513 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John E Murray (University of Toledo, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1996 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 245-256 |
| Data de publicação | 1996-04-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1996.tb03205.x |
| OpenAlex | W2065293527 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 8 |
The influence of Henry George on the Shakers has been misunderstood. The most prominent late nineteenth century Shaker elder was Frederick W. Evans, brother of George Henry Evans, the land reformer of the second quarter of the century. Similarities in the programs of G. H. Evans and Henry George have been recognized, but the two proposed different kinds of land reforms. Evans promoted quantitative restrictions on land ownership, while George was known for his advocacy of a single tax on land. The New York Shakers, as large land owners, successfully resisted early G. H. Evans type land reforms. Later, Shakers led by F. W. Evans embraced Henry George-type policy proposals and supported George for mayor of New York City. E. W. Evans himself, however, conflated Henry George's proposals with those of his brother, never realizing the contradiction between the two, much less resolving it. The consequences of Shaker ambivalence toward their large landholdings persisted well into the twentieth century
Ambivalence · Art · Art history · Brother · Contradiction · Economic history · Evans Blue · George (robot) · Political science · Shaker · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Race, History, and American Society
| Citações por ano | 0,07 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 1997 - 1999 (3) |
| Altamente citado | Não |