Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Body composition of female office workers compared with infrared reflection measurement, bioimpedance analysis and calipermetry

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2979288
AutoresChristoph Raschka, O-Sung Kwon, Osung Kwon (0000-0001-8527-5270), Horst J Koch (Klinikum Braunschweig)
Ano2022
Volume31
Fascículo2
Páginas29-38
Data de publicação2022-12-31
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPapers on Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1406-0140 • E-ISSN: 1736-7646
EditoraUniversity of Tartu (PUBLISHER • EE)
DOI10.12697/poa.2022.31.2.03
OpenAlexW4366180459
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas7

There are currently many different anthropometric methods for determining the individual body fat percentage, as well as almost as many variants of bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and only a single method of infrared reflection measurement (IR) as easily available methods of field research. The present study aims at a simultaneous comparison between calipermetry, IR and BIA. In particular, the question which measurement method could be used as an equivalent method in the event of failure of BIA or IR is investigated. The sample group consisted of 121 female office workers (average age 32.5 ± 9.4 years, average height 164.5 ± 6.3 cm and average weight 60.3 ± 6.8 kg), from the Rhine-Main area. The measurements were previously scheduled and mostly carried out during the lunch break. For anthropometry, 13 skin fat folds were measured with the Accu(R) Measure Caliper, thigh circumference with a measuring tape, the height with a height measuring device and the body mass on the weight scale. Subsequently, an IR measurement (Futrex(R)) and a BIA (InBody(R)) were performed on the same subjects. The parameters of body fat percentage and total body water (in L) were examined. Statistical methods were correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman comparison and paired t-test for equivalence. For the women studied, the highest correlation coefficients were in the comparisons between the formulas according to Parízková and Brožek et al. (r = 0.82), as well as for Parízková and Siri (r = 0.82). The correlation coefficient for the IR vs. BIA comparison was r = 0.92. A key result of the present study was the finding that the investigated methods in a female study group could not be substituted in an equivalent way

Animal science · Anthropometry · Body mass index · Body weight · Calipers · Correlation coefficient · Geometry · Hydrostatic weighing · Limits of agreement · Nuclear medicine · Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient · Statistics · Waist · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Mathematics · Medicine

  • Densitometric Analysis of Body Composition

    Open Access•Josef Brozek, FRANCISCO GRANDE et al.•Annals of the New York Academy of…•1963

  • Measuring agreement in method comparison studies

    Open Access•John M Bland, David G Altman et al.•Statistical Methods in Medical…•1999

  • The Gross Composition of the Body

    WILLIAM E SIRI•Advances in biological and…•1956

  • Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement

    Open Access•J Martin Bland, DouglasG Altman•The Lancet•1986

  • Effect of diurnal variation on body composition under consideration of selected chronobiological marker systems

    Open Access•Manuela Dittmar, Christoph Raschka et al.•Anthropological Review•2002

  • Anthropologie. Handbuch der vergleichenden biologie des menschen

    Open Access•A Brigitte Demes•Journal of Human Evolution•1991

  • Body composition of male office workers compared by means of infrared reflection measurement, bioimpedance analysis and calipermetry

    Open Access•Christoph Raschka, O-Sung Kwon et al.•Papers on Anthropology•2021

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae