Reflections on the history of dependency notions in linguistics

This paper outlines the history of dependency notions from Antiquity to the present century. Although the notion of syntactic dependency was unknown in Antiquity, the idea of semantic dependency was foreshadowed in early definitions of the minor parts of speech, i.e., parts of speech other than the noun and the verb. In part, this happened because logicians had originally posited only the two major parts of speech, and grammarians then formulated their definitions of the minor parts of speech in relation to those of the noun and the verb. The adverb, for instance, was defined as augmenting or diminishing the meaning of the verb. The first writer who used (if not coined) a special term to refer to the notion that some words specify or 'determine' the meanings of the subject noun and the verbal predicate was Boethius (ca. 500 A.D.), and in this way the notion of 'determination' was launched. As a result of the subsequent popularity of Boethius's logical works, 'determination' was adopted and extensively utilized by Latin grammarians from the 12th century on. In the 13th century, it was complemented by the term 'dependency', which was the logical converse of 'determination'. Grammarians claimed that a dependency relation exists between the members of all constructions. The vogue of 'dependency' declined even before the advent of Renaissance humanism, while 'determination' survived. In the early modern period, the terminological repertory expanded. Thus, in the 18th century, French grammarians coined the terms 'modification' (Buffier) and 'complement' (Du Marsais). The 20th century has been marked by a further increase of new terms. Inspired by Tesnière's posthumousElèments de syntaxe structurale(1959), some linguists have also proposed formalized dependency theories as alternatives to phrase-structure grammar

Dependency (UML · Inflection · Linguistics · Noun · Predicate (mathematical logic · Proposition · Verb · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

• Reaction to

  Open Access•Richard Hudson•Lingua•2010

  Incluir item

• The conjunction between coordination and subordination in missionary grammars of Aymara and Quechua

  Open Access•Annamaria Bartolotta•Historiographia Linguistica•2025

  Incluir item

• Medieval Commentators on the Notion 'persona agentis' in Priscian's Syntactic Theory

  Karin Margareta Fredborg•Historiographia Linguistica•2014

  Incluir item

• The Encyclopedia of philosophy

  Paul Edwards•The Encyclopedia of philosophy•1996

  Incluir item

• Ancient scholastic logic as the source of medieval scholastic logic

  Open Access•Sten Ebbesen•The Cambridge history of later…•1982

  Incluir item

• Syntactic Structures

  Noam Chomsky•Syntactic Structures•1957

  Incluir item

• Œuvres de Maupertuis

  Maupertuis Maupertuis•Œuvres de Maupertuis•1768

  Incluir item

• Studies in the History of Linguistics

  Paul Salmon, Vivian Salmon et al.•Language•1976

  Incluir item

• William of Sherwood's Treatise on Syncategorematic Words

  Martha Kneale, Norman Kretzmann•The Philosophical Quarterly•1970

  Incluir item

• Methods in Structural Linguistics

  C F Voegelin, Zellig S Harris•Journal of the American Oriental…•1952

  Incluir item

• A Course in Modern Linguistics

  Open Access•Charles F Hockett•Language Learning•1958

  Incluir item

• Diversions of Bloomsbury

  Robert A Hall, R H Robins•Man•1971

  Incluir item