East Asian Approaches
Region, History and Civilization
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3161884 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Johann P Arnason (0000-0002-2320-5346, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1999 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 97-112 |
| Data de publicação | 1999-05-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Thesis Eleven (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0725-5136 • E-ISSN: 1461-7455 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0725513699057000008 |
| OpenAlex | W2050847100 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 10 |
The historical unity of the East Asian region - defined as made up of China, Korea and Japan - is based on three successive phases: the longue durée of the traditional Sinocentric order, the ear of imperialist conflicts from the mid-19th to the mid-20th century, and the post-war developmentalist turn. The idea of a Confucian tradition or region is best understood as an attempt to superimpose a more emphatic conception of cultural identity on this historical constellation, and to rebuild bridges between past and present. For a critical and comparative analysis of the claims made in relation to Confucianism and its modernizing potential, it is essential to move from the issue of capitalist development to a broader civilizational framework
Aesthetics · China · Civilization · East Asia · Political science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy
Escape from Predicament
Why Has Japan 'Succeeded'
Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions
The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought
The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy
Public Sphere "/"Civil Society" in China
Le nouveau confucianisme
Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity
Centrality and Commonality
| Citações por ano | 0,1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2005 - 2022 (18) |
| Altamente citado | Não |