Political Science and the Proposal for a National Social Science Foundation

Political scientists ... are ... ex-post-facto entrail watchers ... after-the-event sooth-sayers," said the late Lucius Beebe. Similarly, much of the general public has long felt that social scientists are not scientists at all but deal in intuition and vague, unfounded generalizations, or are "proposition mongers," a threat to policymakers.These notions, together with the fact that social scientists work in sensitive, moral-charged subjects which frequently cause strong public reaction, are partly responsible for the relatively small support the Federal Government has given to research and scholarship in the social sciences.In 1965 basic research of all types funded by the Federal Government amounted to $1.69 billion, of which the social sciences received only $37 million, or 2.2 per cent. The estimated obligations for 1966 and 1967 were about the same, 2.5 per cent and 2.8 per cent. Nor is there much difference when Federal support for applied research is considered. For 1965, Federal social science expenditures for applied research amounted to only 2.8 per cent of the $3.16 billion the Federal Government spent for all types of applied research, and for 1966 and 1967, estimated expenditures, are only 3.9 per cent and 4.8 per cent

De facto · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Proposition · Scholarship · Social research · Social science · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Political Science Research and Education · Public Administration

• Drawing New Lines

  Jean-Baptiste Fleury•History of Political Economy•2010

  Incluir item

• Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Proposal

  Mark Solovey•Isis•2012

  Incluir item

• Social sciences and social problems

  Open Access•Henry W Riecken•Social Science Information•1969

  Incluir item

• Government-science relations

  Henry W Riecken•American Psychologist•1967

  Incluir item