Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Scope of Mandatory Bargaining

A Critique and a Proposal

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3244232
AutoresDonna Sockell (autor correspondente)
Ano1986
Volume40
Fascículo1
Páginas19
Data de publicação1986-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoIndustrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X
EditoraJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2523943
OpenAlexW4256098632
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas20

This paper argues that the mandatory-permissive distinction in the scope of the duty to bargain collectively should be abandoned in favor of a policy of classifying all lawful subjects as mandatory. The author shows that in recent applications of the distinction by the NLRB and the courts, many subjects of interest to labor have been declared within the exclusive control of management. She argues that the rationales used by the Board and the courts in these decisions are not compelling, and the mandatory-permissive distinction is even less convincing when its current application is compared to the criteria of an ideal scope of bargaining

Business · Control (management) · Duty · Economics · Ideal (ethics) · Law and economics · Management · Permissive · Political science · Programming language · Scope (computer science) · Computer Science · International Labor and Employment Law · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Medicine

  • Legal responses to technological change in Canada

    Open Access•E G Fisher, James C Robb•New Technology Work and Employment•1989

  • Labor Standards in the United States and Canada

    Tequila Brooks, Tequila J Brooks et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2004

  • The Mandatory-Permissive Distinction and Collective Bargaining Outcomes

    John Thomas Delaney, Donna Sockell•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1989

  • The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law

    Katherine Stone, Katherine Van Wezel Stone•The Yale Law Journal•1981

  • Conflicting Statutory Purposes

    Open Access•James A Gross•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

  • U.S. Industrial Relations 1950-1980

    Harold M Levinson, Jack Stieber et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1983

  • Union Challenge to Management Control

    Richard A Lester, Neil W Chamberlain•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1948

  • The NLRA at Fifty

    Open Access•John Thomas Delaney, David Lewin et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

  • Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs

    Open Access•Harry C Katz, Thomas A Kochan et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1983

  • The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools

    Stephen A Woodbury•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,11
Intervalo de citações1989 - 2004 (16)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae