Open Fields and Partible Inheritance on a Kent Manor

ince H. L. Gray's account in I 9 I 5 of English field systems, further studies have extended the limits within which the midland common field husbandry is known to have been practised.1 Ambiguity about the Kentish field system has remained, there being too few exhaustive studies of individual townships. M. D. Nightingale collected considerable evidence of the former existence of an open-field system of some sort in Kent and concluded that the Kentish-field system was homologous with the midland system, a view repeated by C. S. and C. S. Orwin in a revision of their book, The Open Fields, and lately by H. P. R. Finberg in a survey of recent progress in English agrarian history.2 Yet Nightingale's conclusion was based upon two assumptions: that Kentish open fields were common fields, i.e. a product of co-operative ploughing and subject to common grazing, and that partible inheritance had ceased to be the popular custom in Kent by the end of the eleventh century.3 Both assumptions require testing within individual townships before his conclusion becomes generally accepted. A useful township for study is Gillingham: from his study of a mid-fifteenth century survey of the manor, Gray concluded that the iuga or yokes in Gillingham were 'clearly rectangular' and he described the field system as 'one of non-contiguous, yet not widely scattered, parcels'. He then described these features observed at Gillingham as typical of the Kentish system as a whole.4 Considerable additional material relating to the manor has come to light since i 9I and it has therefore seemed worth while to inquire more closely into its field system

Biology · Genealogy · Geography · Inheritance (genetic algorithm) · Genetics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Medieval Literature and History

• The Medieval Fields of Strettington, West Sussex, and the Evolution of Land Division

  Alan Nash•Geografiska Annaler Series B…•1982

  Incluir item

• Kin and Neighbors in a Thirteenth-Century Suffolk Community

  Open Access•Richard M Smith•Journal of Family History•1979

  Incluir item

• Inheritance Customs and Succession to Land in the Chiltern Hills in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries

  Open Access•David Roden•Journal of British Studies•1967

  Incluir item

• Field Systems of the Chiltern Hills and of Parts of Kent from the Late Thirteenth to the Early Seventeenth Century

  David Roden, Alan R H Baker•Transactions of the Institute of…•1966

  Incluir item

• Agriculture and Rural Life in the Later Roman Empire

  Open Access•Courtenay Edward Stevens•The Cambridge economic history of…•1966

  Incluir item

• People and Land in the Middle Ages, 1066–1500

  Bruce M S Campbell, Bruce Campbell•An Historical geography of…•1990

  Incluir item

• The Agrarian Problem in the Early Fourteenth Century

  Bruce M S Campbell, Bruce Campbell•Past & Present•2005

  Incluir item

• Anglo-Sakson İngi̇ltere’de Kullanilan “Ortak Tarla Si̇stemi̇” Nedi̇r

  Open Access•Sultan GÜRSOY•Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar…•2025

  Incluir item

• Population Change and the Genesis of Commonfields on a Norfolk Manor

  Bruce M S Campbell, Bruce Campbell•The Economic History Review•1980

  Incluir item

• The Economic Position of Husbandmen at the Time of Domesday Book

  K P Witney, Keith Witney•The Economic History Review•1984

  Incluir item