Operative Doctrines of Representation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3376565 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles E Gilbert (Swarthmore College, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1963 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 604-618 |
| Data de publicação | 1963-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1952566 |
| OpenAlex | W2149348859 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
The main point of this article is to identify some traditions of American thought that figure in analysis of the distinctively democratic aspects of government. The discussion is centered on doctrines of "representation." While that term has a generally understood meaning, its application in specific contexts depends upon values and expectations closely related to other largely procedural aspects of politics; and together these perspectives figure in appraisals and decisions of policy.The "distinctively democratic aspects of government" have broadly to do, I think, with relations between public officials and the population. These can be conceptualized and described in terms of institutions, influence, identification, or exchange, and are so treated in various positive or empirical approaches. At the points where normative critique and empirical description join, the literature of American political science seems to have converged on several broad concerns that tend to organize and orient discussion-e.g., representation, responsibility, rationality, and lately, the "public interest," of which "representation" surely has the clearest empirical reference. These are overlapping or intersecting concerns. They emphasize different aspects of government and different blends of calculation and control (or intellectual versus institutional elements); but they do not refer to distinct phenomena, and they relate to common normative traditions. Such terms are often, I think, of dubious utility because they tend to obscure the more detailed values at stake in action or discussion and perhaps thereby to discourage more pointed empirical inquiry relevant to those values. However that may be, the interrelatedness of these concerns and the broad relevance of "representation" can be briefly indicated
Action (physics · Democracy · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Identification (biology · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Normative · Political science · Politics · Population · Positive economics · Rationality · Relevance (law · Representation (politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Politics, economics, and welfare
Politics, planning, and the public interest
Social thought in America
Constitutional Government in the United States
Liberal Tradition in America
An economic theory of democracy
Social Choice and Individual Values
Five Types of Ethical Theory
Individualism and Economic Order
Economic Policy for a Free Society
Democracy, The Threshold of Freedom
Democracy in the Mid-Twentieth Century
Social Choice and Individual Values
Philosophical Theory of the State
James Mill on Universal Suffrage and the Middle Class
Public Policy and Administration
The Liberal Tradition in America
Research in the Political Process
The New Order of Mary Parker Follett
Responsiveness, Responsibility, and Majority Rule
American Social Psychology-1951
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,08 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1964 - 1992 (29) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |