The British Museum and British Archaeology

To aid digestion of ANTIQUITY'S yeasty September Editorial, on our own and other national museums and archaeologies, I offer what follows as a chaser. 'The British', declared the Editor, 'are a disgrace archaeologically', because they have not bothered to insist on a first-class museum, at the centre, for their national archaeology and history. Other nations have, with results that can be splendid. They have the cultural patriotism; where is ours? It is not absent really. It is divided. In Wales and Scotland, primarily and rightly, it is Welsh and Scottish; and in Edinburgh and Cardiff, no less than in independent Ireland, there are admirable national museums. What then of the English? Why no 'Bloomsbury marchers', demanding and getting museum reform in London? In the English population, the archaeology-conscious proportion is among the largest in the world; but its loyalties are very largely regional. London is all very well, but you should see our county museum in Blankshire, or our town museum in Blankington, or our village museum in Little Blankworth! This English regionalism indeed must guard against disorder: that is partly what the Council for British Archaeology, with its Regional Groups, is for. But to call it a disgrace, when it is really our peculiar glory, will not help the cause of a national museum in London-nor, incidentally, the popularity of ANTIQUITY

Archaeology · Glory · National museum · Patriotism · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Population · Regionalism (politics) · Sociology · Welsh · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law · Museums and Cultural Heritage

• The Organizational Context in the History of Archaeology

  Open Access•William Chapman•The Antiquaries Journal•1989

  Incluir item

• It's better to dig than dance

  Open Access•Timothy Darvill•Antiquity•2002

  Incluir item