Paramilitarism and Colombia's Low-Intensity Democracy

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3424344
AutoresWilliam Avilés (0000-0003-1468-1719, University of Nebraska at Kearney, autor correspondente)
Ano2006
Volume38
Fascículo2
Páginas379-408
Data de publicação2006-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Latin American Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-216X • E-ISSN: 1469-767X
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022216x06000757
OpenAlexW2171690492
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas19

In the late 1980s and early 1990s political liberalisation, including the reduction of the military's institutional prerogatives, occurred in Colombia despite the increasing strength of an internal insurgency. Why would Colombia's national political elite weaken the institutional role of the armed forces in the context of an escalating internal war? What was the role of paramilitary groups, which were responsible for the vast majority of massacres and political violence against suspected unarmed civilians, during the 1990s? This paper argues that the elite civilian politicians who dominated the Colombian state promoted formal institutional changes, but tolerated paramilitary repression in order to counteract a strengthening guerrilla insurgency. These civilian leaders represented a modernising elite focused upon co-opting political opposition and establishing neoliberal economic reforms, thus constructing a Low-Intensity Democracy

Citizen journalism · Context (archaeology) · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Elite · Geography · Guerrilla warfare · Insurgency · Liberalization · Opposition (politics) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia · History and Politics in Latin America · International Relations in Latin America · Law