The Cruelty of Supersessionism

The impact of the Shoah on Christian biblical and theological studies has been significant. The Christian doctrine of supersessionism, the replacement of the Jews and Judaism by the Christian church, has come in for particular criticism. Some more traditional scholars have either ignored these critiques or suggested that they were shaped not by critical study of the biblical text but by Christian guilt. It is also argued that the supersessionist argument is so thoroughly woven into the Christian story that extracting it would destroy the story itself. For some, it appears that there is no Christianity without supersessionism. This paper argues not only that this challenge to supersessionism was indeed the result of post-Shoah reflection, but that such challenges were appropriate and necessary. It does this in part by considering the case of German pastor and theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer whose early citations of the "teachings of contempt" were challenged by the violence of Nazis and the clarity of their intent to destroy both the Jews and, eventually, the church. A non-supersessionist Christianity is both possible and necessary, not simply to preserve the relationship between Christians and Jews, but to enable both communities to engage in the work of "consummation" and "redemption" that God has entrusted to them

Christianity · Consummation · Contempt · Criticism · Cruelty · Doctrine · German · Judaism · Nazism · Political science · Schism · The Holocaust · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Christian Theology and Mission · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity · Religious studies

• Mordecai Would Not Bow Down

  Timothy P Jackson•Mordecai Would Not Bow Down•2021

  Incluir item

• Jews and the Christian Imagination

  Open Access•Stephen R Haynes, S Haynes•Jews and the Christian Imagination•1995

  Incluir item