China in the Japanese Radical Gaze, 1945-1955
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3653992 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Curtis Anderson Gayle (Japan Women's University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1255-1286 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Modern Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0026749x08003867 |
| OpenAlex | W1965659280 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 28 |
Japanese images of China have much to tell us about the way Japan sees its own modernisation and its place in the international system. Contrary to popular belief, Japan did not turn unabashedly toward the USA after 1945. During the first decade after World War II, a number of important Japanese radical historians and thinkers decided that modernisation could be accomplished without the help of the West. Just when many in Japan were looking to America and Europe as exemplars of modernisation, others looked instead to revolutionary China and its past struggles against Japanese colonialism in the construction of a very different historical position from that ordinarily associated with the early post-war years. Certain Japanese historians, inspired by the push toward decolonisation in Asia, set about writing the history of the present in ways that aligned Japan with modern Chinese history. Even though China had just been liberated from Japanese colonial rule, Japanese Marxists saw their own position-under American imperialism-as historically and politically congruous with China's past war of resistance against Japan (1937-45). Through campaigns to develop a kind of cultural Marxism on the margins of Japanese society, they sought to bring about post-war Japanese 'national liberation' from American hegemony in ways that consciously simulated past Chinese resistance to Imperial Japan. Replacing Japan's own cultural Marxist traditions from the pre-war era with the more palpable and acceptable example of China, they also hoped a new form of Asian internationalism could remedy the problem of Japan's wartime past. The historical irony associated with this discursive twist deferred to future generations the problem of how the Left* would come to terms with the past
China · Colonialism · Decolonization · Economic history · Hegemony · Internationalism (politics · Marxist philosophy · Modernization theory · Political science · Politics · Resistance (ecology · World War II · Australian History and Society · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law
The Myth of Continents
The Cultural Front
Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain
Haiboku o dakishimete
New Asian Marxisms
Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History
Orientalism, Postmodernism and Globalism
War and Popular Culture
The Origins of Socialist Thought in Japan
The State, Identity, and the National Question in China and Japan
Things Seen and Unseen
Marxist History and Postwar Japanese Nationalism
The Japanese Communist Movement, 1920-1966
Mirror of Modernity
Orientalism, Postmodernism, and Globalism
Antonio Gramsci. selections from cultural writings
The Essential Wallerstein
Understanding Nationalism
Showa
Mirror of Modernity
The Past Is a Foreign Country
Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History
Nationalism and the International Labor Movement
Things Seen and Unseen
The Past is a Foreign Country
Marx and the End of Orientalism
The Origins of Socialist Thought in Japan
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,36 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2022 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |