Rethinking China's rise
Chinese scholars debate strategic overstretch
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3672497 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Xiaoyu Pu (0000-0001-5059-3324), Chengli Wang (0000-0003-1887-8746) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1019-1035 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiy140 |
| OpenAlex | W2892337482 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 27 |
In recent years, some Chinese elites have started to rethink the strategies and tactics of China's rise on the global stage. Some scholars see the problems in the West as strategic opportunities for China. However, others worry that Beijing might have taken steps too bold and too soon. This article aims to provide an updated analysis of the Chinese scholarly debate of strategic overstretch. Similar to the economics of cost–benefit analysis, strategic overstretch occurs if the cost of maintaining the existing system exceeds the benefits. Most Chinese scholars agree that China's policy community should pay more attention to the topic of strategic overstretch, while they disagree on the extent to which China already has such a problem. Designing and implementing a prudent grand strategy is an enduring challenge for Great Powers and Chinese scholars have taken different positions on the goals, means and time horizon of China's grand strategy. While we cannot claim that the Chinese scholarly debate has fundamentally changed China's foreign policy, there is a clear correlation between the emergence of a cautious voice in the academic world and the moderation of Chinese foreign policy—even as China continues to implement an ambitious foreign policy in a new era.
Beijing · China · Foreign policy · Grand strategy · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
How Much Risk Should the United States Run in the South China Sea
China, the un, and Human Protection
China's “Major Country Diplomacy”
Myths of Multipolarity
China’s grand strategy and Myanmar’s peace process
Great Power Competition and China's Security Assistance to Africa
China’s motives, influence and prospects in Pacific Island countries
Belt and Road Initiative alias Chinese Dream
Personnel power shift? Unpacking China's attempts to enter the UN civil service
La Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta en América Latina
China’s policies on bottom trawl fisheries over seven decades (1949–2018)
Explaining India’s View of China’s Military Relations with Other South Asian Countries
China’s Perspective on the International Maritime Order
Overstretching or Overreaction? China’s Rise in Latin America and the US Response
China’s foreign and security policy institutions and decision-making under Xi Jinping
Multidimensional Evaluation of Higher Education Compensation Systems
Multilateralism and Soft Power Made-in-China
Cautious optimism
Unveiling the Chinese understanding of European strategic autonomy and its policy implications
Asia and Latin America Relations in the Twenty-First Century
Is Covid-Era Assertiveness in Chinese Foreign Policy Novel
The new cold war and the rise of the 21st‐century infrastructure state
Domestic Polarization and International Rivalry
Reconceptualizing International Order
Censor and Sensitivity
The Perils of Hubris? A Tragic Reading of “Thucydides’ Trap” and China-US Relations
States of emergence, states of knowledge
| Obras citantes distintas | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3,86 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 26 |