New directions for leader personality research
Breaking Bad in Foreign Policy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3694732 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Juliet Kaarbo (0000-0002-3728-8437, University of Edinburgh, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 423-441 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-03-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiaa221 |
| OpenAlex | W3136287941 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
This article considers how leaders' personality traits change over time. I focus on how leaders become more authoritarian, overconfident and more mistake-prone; how, when and why do leaders 'break bad'? Temporal evolution of leaders is an important topic given the long tenure of many political leaders and the influence these leaders have over policies, including foreign policies. There is very little work on how leaders' personalities develop and how they interact with changing constraints and opportunities. This article is an agenda-setting review, designed to push foreign policy analysis in new directions. This is especially important given the resurgence in research on personalities and the renewed interest in leaders. Drawing on diverse and multi-disciplinary scholarship on the psychological effects of aging, experience, learning and power-holding, this article develops expectations about leader personality change. I discuss challenges for research in this area, focusing on how 'bad' can be conceptualized, and offer specific avenues for future investigations
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Mistake · Personality · Personality psychology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Public relations · Scholarship · Sociology · Cultural Differences and Values · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Getting Inside the Mind of Leaders and Advisers
Totus mundus agit histrionem’
Followers First
International relations theory and US–China competition
No more Mr nice guy? A leadership trait analysis of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer
Domestic imperative of the Philippines’ South China Sea policy
Reconceptualizing Poor Leadership Through Islamic Lens
When do crises centralise decision-making? The core executive in the Greek economic crisis
A Typology Analysis of US Strategic Intervention to the Taiwan Question in the US-China Competition Era
Xi Jinping's Operational Code Beliefs and China's Foreign Policy
Personality and Foreign Policy
Simple vs. Complex Learning Revisited
Examining leaders’ orientations to structural constraints
Introducing the Lead Data Set
When and why leaders put themselves first
Go Big or Go Home? Positive Emotions and Responses to Wartime Success
Personality or Role? Comparisons of Turkish Leaders Across Different Institutional Positions
The Conceptual Complexity of Presidents Carter and Clinton
The Captive King and His Captive Court
Explaining Rigidity and Pragmatism in Political Leaders
Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy
Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations
Presidential Operational Codes and Foreign Policy Conflicts in the Post-Cold War World
Political learning by doing
Power and the objectification of social targets
The Operational Codes of Fidel Castro and Kim Il Sung
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |