The Right to a Healthy Environment and Law's Hidden Subjects

In this essay I reflect upon whether and how the recent international recognition of the right to a healthy environment might--or might not--provide greater support for efforts to define and protect the rights of what one could term "law's hidden subjects," namely future generations and nature. Although there are several examples of rights-based regimes that aim to protect future generations and nature, few would disagree that these hidden subjects require better legal protection, and that thoroughgoing reform of existing human rights law is overdue. I argue that the international recognition of a human right to a healthy environment might contribute less to such reforms than what one would have intuitively expected. One reason for this is because the formulation of the right does not provide anything new in terms of more comprehensive recognition and protection of rights of nature and future generations. Although it is an important symbolic event that signifies broad consensus on the importance of rights-based environmental protection, many domestic and regional legal regimes already protect future generations, while some even offer innovative rights of nature provisions. At best, UN General Assembly Resolution 76/300 merely reinforces the status quo ante

Human rights · International law · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Status quo · Environmental law and policy · Human Rights and Development · International Environmental Law and Policies · Law

• One-dimensional law

  Open Access•Marina Lostal•The International Journal of…•2024

  Incluir item

• Mattering in the Anthropocene

  Open Access•Corina Heri•The International Journal of…•2026

  Incluir item